by Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.

There seems to be a persistent myth among providers of private duty/homecare services that the federal anti-kickback statute applies to Medicare-certified providers only. On the contrary, the anti-kickback statute applies to providers who receive funds from any state or federal healthcare program; including the Medicaid Program, VA, TRICARE, etc. Private duty providers: This means many of you! Lately it has become clear that private payors have joined fraud enforcement efforts.

In a recent case, a provider in Detroit pled guilty to conspiring to commit health care fraud. The conspiracy resulted in losses totaling $1.9 million to Medicare, Medicaid, and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. The investigation was conducted by the FBI and the Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the primary enforcer of fraud and abuse prohibitions.

It is important to note that the provider was criminally prosecuted not only for fraud with regard to claims submitted to Medicare and Medicaid Programs, but also fraud committed against a private payor, Blue Cross Blue Shield.

It now appears that providers who receive payments from third party payors must be concerned about fraud enforcement. Consequently, providers of private duty/home care services must develop, implement, and update Compliance Programs.

Compliance Programs are specific types of documents that routinely address issues that providers do not usually cover in internal policies and procedures. In addition, providers may not gain benefits related to fraud enforcement if there is no formal document called a Compliance Program.

Some providers think that accreditation means they are in compliance. On the contrary, providers may be accredited but fail to meet applicable compliance standards for fraud and abuse. Compliance Programs appropriately address potential fraud and abuse issues. They also include mechanisms for helping to ensure compliance, such as processes for identification and correction of potential problems that are not addressed during the certification process.

Providers also need to know that developing, implementing, and updating Compliance Programs may make a considerable difference during fraud enforcement actions. If providers have Compliance Programs in place that are current and fully implemented, enforcers may be less aggressive in pursuing potential violations.

When enforcers discover problems with fraud and abuse in organizations, providers are usually asked to develop and implement a Corporate Integrity Agreement (CIA). This type of agreement is likely to include processes for stringent monitoring on a continuous basis. These monitoring activities can be extremely burdensome to providers in terms of both time and money. Providers with valid Compliance Programs are not necessarily asked to develop and implement CIA’s.

Now is the time for all providers, including private duty/home care companies, to recognize and act upon the need to establish and maintain Compliance Programs. “Working on it” is no longer good enough.

# # #

Elizabeth Hogue is an attorney in private practice with extensive experience in health care. She represents clients across the U.S., including professional associations, managed care providers, hospitals, long-term care facilities, home health agencies, durable medical equipment companies, and hospices.

©2026 Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq. All rights reserved.
No portion of this material may be reproduced in any form without the advance written permission of the author.

©2026 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved.