Situational Awareness Training

Admin

by Lauren Rogers and Bobby McLain

Enhancing Safety Through Situational Awareness

For home-health, hospice, and social workers, maintaining safety in unpredictable environments is crucial. Situational awareness is a key tool in ensuring personal safety and effective response to potential threats. It involves four main characteristics: observation, orientation, decision, and action. Here’s a brief guide on how to apply these principles in your daily work.

Observation

For home-health, hospice, and social workers, maintaining safety in unpredictable environments is crucial. Situational awareness is a key tool in ensuring personal safety and effective response to potential threats. It involves four main characteristics: observation, orientation, decision, and action. Here’s a brief guide on how to apply these principles in your daily work.

Situational Awareness
Situational Awareness

Orientation

Orientation involves understanding and processing the information you’ve observed based on your own experience and knowledge. Think about what is around you—consider the layout of the environment and how it affects your safety. If you find yourself in a difficult situation, where will you seek help? Familiarize yourself with exit routes and safe locations within the home or area.

Decision

Once you’ve gathered and processed information, it’s time to make decisions. Weigh your options carefully to determine the best course of action. Consider what you can do within your capabilities to mitigate any risks. Your decisions should aim to ensure your safety while also maintaining the well-being of those you serve.

Situational Awareness
Situational Awareness

Action

Action is the final step, where you use all the information and decisions you’ve made to execute a plan for safety. If you’ve identified a potential danger, act quickly and decisively. This might involve leaving the situation, calling for help, or using safety tools and protocols designed for emergencies.

Situational Awareness Final Thoughts

Applying situational awareness can significantly enhance your safety and effectiveness as a home-health, hospice, or social worker. By mastering observation, orientation, decision, and action, you’ll be better equipped to navigate challenging situations and ensure a safer work environment. Stay alert, make informed decisions, and take proactive steps to protect yourself and those you serve.

# # #

Lauren Rogers

Lauren Rogers serves as the Director of Healthcare at Katana Safety, where she leverages her experience to enhance workplace safety in healthcare environments. She focuses  on post-acute care providers and is dedicated to integrating innovative safety solutions that protect healthcare professionals.

She is passionate about creating safer environments, reducing risks for healthcare workers, and driving positive industry change. At Katana Safety, Lauren is committed to developing strategies that prioritize the well-being and safety of healthcare teams.

Bobby McLain

Bobby McLain is Chief Experience Officer for KATANA Safety, the Premier Provider of Lone and Workforce Safety Solutions.  McLain’s previous roles include interim marketing leadership for multiple companies and executive positions at ScanSource, Inc., working in the company’s global marketing and strategic expansion efforts. McLain’s career began in event management and marketing, supported by a Bachelor of Arts in Journalism with a focus on Advertising/PR from the University of South Carolina. He can be reached at bobby@katanasafety.com or 864-630-9016   KATANA Safety: Never A Lone Worker

©2024 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in Healthcare at Home: The Rowan Report. One copy may be printed for personal use: further reproduction by permission only. editor@therowanreport.com

National Alliance for Care at Home: An Interview with Dr. Steve Landers Part 1

Admin

by Kristin Rowan, Editor

Alliance CEO Landers

For more than a year now, The Rowan Report has been providing updates on the merger between the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization (NHPCO) and the National Association for Home Care & Hospice (NAHC). This week, we attended the first National Alliance for Care at Home (The Alliance) Annual Home Care and Hospice Conference and Expo. We had the opportunity to sit down with Dr. Steve Landers, inaugural Chief Executive Officer of The Alliance.

Dr. Steven "Steve" Landers

Dr. Steven Landers brings his almost 20 years of experience to The Alliance as its first CEO. Dr. Landers is a board-certified physician in family medicine, geriatric medicine, and hospice and palliative medicine. He has dedicated his career to seeking home- and community-based solution to traditional healthcare. His focus is on providing compassionate, dignified, and cost-effective care to patients.

Dr. Landers graduated from Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, where he completed a geriatric medicine fellowship at the Cleveland Clinic.

Dr. Landers is no stranger to NAHC and NHPCO, having previously served on the board of directors for NAHC.  He has met with Congress, state legislatures, CMS, and PAC officials, providing testimonies, discussing home care policy and regulation, and advocating for care at home.

Steve lives in Little Silver, New Jersey, with his wife, Allison, and their three sons. His hobbies include golfing, fishing, hiking, traveling, enjoying good food and watching horse racing. When he is not taking part in these activities, you can find him cheering on his sports teams — the Browns, Cavaliers, Guardians and Indiana Hoosiers.

The Alliance Landers
The Alliance Landers

Dr. Steven Landers: On the Record

The Alliance Landers
The Rowan Report:

What do you know about the status of the ongoing lawsuits, going back to the 2024 final rule?

Dr. Steven Landers:

One, we should probably bring Bill [Dombi] into it because he’s truly a technical expert on it and I’m still getting up to speed on it. My understanding is there is no active lawsuit at the moment. We were asked to go back and take some additional administrative steps, which we’re doing. Then we’ll be able to evaluate what further legal paths are possible.

RR: 

That leads me to, not a question, but an observation I’d like you to comment on, Steve. For 45 years, the organization has been run by attorneys and the emphasis in lobbying and advocacy has been ‘you need to stop this cut because it’s hurting businesses and also it’s hurting patients.’ The way you’re talking, you emphasize as you begin with how it’s hurting patients. And so I’m wondering if the organization being run by a physician and not an attorney indicates that different emphasis going forward.

Steve: 

I certainly am going to do everything I can to tell the story of how policies impact patients and families. That will be part of what I try to do every single day using my experiences as a physician to do that.

RR:

Would it be exaggerating to say “new day, new emphasis” at The Alliance?

Steve:

Well, The Alliance is new in and of itself, so The Alliance is a new day for the industry, a hundred percent. We brought together two legacy organizations. The opportunity to have a stronger voice is very real and certainly I am going to bring a clinical perspective. I’m also a family caregiver. I have my own personal experiences with home care and hospice that have instructed how I think about these things.

And there is every opportunity here to get stronger, to try to make a bigger impact. I would not diminish the truly heroic work that’s been done by advocates within our associations in the past. There’s a lot of love and care that’s happening out in our country because of the leadership that’s been in place. But as you can see by some of the things that we’re talking about, we need to do better. We need to find another way to tell these stories to somehow get somebody to listen.

The Alliance
RR:

You recently released a statement about your position as CEO of The Alliance and your vision going forward. There was a commitment attached to that. Can you speak to that?

 

Steve: 

Yeah, so that’s one of the things that I’m really happy we’re doing very early in our work with the Alliance. For membership, whether to join or to renew membership, we are requiring an attestation from our members around their commitment to quality and to compliance. We’re requiring any provider member to attest to having a program in place for quality and compliance. And we’re requiring that they attest that they monitor the OIG exclusion list and don’t take referrals for employees that are people that are on that list. Also for home health and hospice providers, we’re asking that they attest that they do their level best to participate in the Medicare Home Health and the Medicare Hospice Quality Reporting program.

In order to make a difference on behalf of our members and make a difference on behalf of the people that need care at home, we have to have as credible and high integrity of a voice as possible. And so this is just one simple step of additional things that we’ll consider going forward. We want to make sure that our alliance, our coalition is high integrity and has a deep commitment to quality and compliance.

RR:

It’s one thing to ask people to sign an attestation. It’s another to find the bad players and help CMS to get rid of them.

Steve:

And we’re right there as a partner in that. I think you’ll see more announcements from us in the future about what we’re doing to help with that. I mean, on one hand, we’ve made many proposals around fighting fraud and hospice in particular. If you followed the hospice policymaking, both Legacy NAHC and Legacy NHPCO over the last year have made many policy recommendations. And you’ll definitely see us both advocating for anti-fraud measures as well as having resources within our association to focus on those topics.

The Alliance Landers
Interviewer 1:

Just to clarify, did either of the legacy organizations have this same kind of attestation?

Steve:

No, this is new. The impact of the legacy organizations cannot be questioned. It’s been amazing. But, it’s a new day and we are looking at ways to increase our impact. So, this is a new part of our membership process that we feel strongly about to just take another step to ensure that our coalition, our membership, is of the highest integrity possible. We are walking the walk and talking the talk with respect to quality and compliance.

RR:

Thank you, Dr. Landers

This article is part 1 of 2 interviewing Dr. Steven Landers. Read the rest of the interview here.

# # #

Kristin Rowan, Editor
Kristin Rowan, Editor

Kristin Rowan has been working at Healthcare at Home: The Rowan Report since 2008. She has a master’s degree in business administration and marketing and runs Girard Marketing Group, a multi-faceted boutique marketing firm specializing in event planning, sales, and marketing strategy. She has recently taken on the role of Editor of The Rowan Report and will add her voice to current Home Care topics as well as marketing tips for home care agencies. Connect with Kristin directly kristin@girardmarketinggroup.com or www.girardmarketinggroup.com

©2024 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in Healthcare at Home: The Rowan Report. One copy may be printed for personal use: further reproduction by permission only. editor@therowanreport.com

Introducing “The National Alliance for Care at Home”

Admin

by Tim Rowan, Editor Emeritus

National Alliance for Care at Home

The merger of the National Association for Home Care and Hospice and the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization, which was inked on July 1, became official this week in Tampa, Florida. The new National Alliance for Care at Home said farewell to retiring NAHC President Bill Dombi and gave a rousing welcome to incoming Alliance CEO, Steven Landers, MD. Both Bill’s farewell address and Dr. Landers’ introduction speech ended with the same theme. We do what we do for the good of our patients. Yes, there is money. Yes, there are politics. In the end, our legacy and our future are about people.

Dr. Steven Landers

Integrity, Quality and Compliance

That future will begin with a commitment to patient care excellence. Dr. Landers closed his opening address with an announcement. From now on, every member, upon beginning or renewing their annual membership, will be asked to sign an attestation pledging their company and themselves personally to commit to Integrity, Quality, and Compliance. “Our members will be known to the world as the best in the industry,” he proclaimed. “They will assure patients, families, and payers that they participate in Medicare and Medicaid quality performance standards.”

In a press conference the next day, Dr. Landers elaborated that NAHC and NHPCO have always worked with public and private payers and law enforcement agencies to rid our industry of those who are not in it for noble reasons. Those cooperative efforts will continue, he told the reporters. The new attestation will further assure the world that members of The Alliance publicly join that mission. One is reminded of a code of conduct common to all our national military academies. “We will not lie, steal, or cheat, nor tolerate among us anyone who does.”

Emphasis on Advocacy

The Alliance is new, and Dr. Landers candidly admits he is gradually learning his new role as he goes along. But he is guided by a commitment to care in the home that has been with him since medical school. “I didn’t want to be just another cog in the system,” he told 2,000+ attendees. “The first time I went along on a home visit, I immediately realized that this is what I wanted to commit my career to.” Through his years at the VNA and Cleveland Clinic, he saw the power of in-home care, including its ability to extend live expectancy and reduce the total cost of care.

Bill Dombi

A Semi-Farewell at Best

National Alliance for Care at Home Dombi

Bill Dombi will serve the new Alliance through the end of this year before fully entering retirement. Following his closing address on the last day of the conference, during which he summarized his 38 years with NAHC (years that began with a promise to his wife Lynn that they would only have to leave their home in Connecticut for the DC area for three to four years), I asked him what he planned to do that first day in January. He said that he accumulated a ton of frequent flyer miles during his career and that they would love to travel somewhere other than state and national association conference cities.

He also mentioned the ongoing legal actions he initiated to force CMS to develop more honest formulae for calculating Home Health reimbursement and added, “It is very difficult to change litigators in the middle of a lawsuit.” Draw your own conclusion but take it from one who knows how difficult it is to completely walk away from this mission and its people. We may not have heard the last of William A. Dombi.

# # #

Tim Rowan, Editor Emeritus

Tim Rowan is a 30-year home care technology consultant who co-founded and served as Editor and principal writer of this publication for 25 years. He continues to occasionally contribute news and analysis articles under The Rowan Report’s new ownership. He also continues to work part-time as a Home Care recruiting and retention consultant. More information: RowanResources.com
Tim@RowanResources.com

©2024 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in Healthcare at Home: The Rowan Report. homecaretechreport.com One copy may be printed for personal use: further reproduction by permission only. editor@homecaretechreport.com

Vendor Watch: HealthRev Partners and Trella Health Announce Partnership

Admin

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Media Contacts:

HealthRev Partners: Hannah Vale
hvale@healthrevpartners.com

Trella Health: Lauren Corcoran
press@trellahealth.com

HealthRev Partners and Trella Health Announce Partnership to Empower Home Health and Hospice Agencies

Driving financial health and strategic growth with complementary solutions in revenue cycle management and market intelligence.

OZARK, Mo. and ATLANTAOct. 17, 2024 /PRNewswire/ — HealthRev Partners, the leading revenue cycle management partner specializing in innovative, tech-driven solutions for home health and hospice agencies, and Trella Health, the leading provider of market intelligence and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) solutions for the post-acute care industry, have announced a new partnership.

HealthRev Partners and Trella Health will collaborate to help agencies reach their full potential by cultivating stronger relationships with referral sources and optimizing their revenue cycle through complementary solutions.

This collaboration brings together HealthRev Partners’ financial expertise and revenue cycle management solutions — helping agencies maximize reimbursements, streamline operations, and drive predictable revenue — with Trella Health’s integrated market intelligence and CRM solutions, which enable agencies to enhance growth strategies, improve referral relationships, and gain valuable insights into their market and competitive landscape.

In Their Own Words

Together, we can equip agencies to achieve better financial health and improve their competitive positioning.

HealthRev Partners Trella Health

“Our collaboration with Trella Health represents a significant leap forward for home health and hospice agencies. By combining our financial expertise and revenue cycle management solutions with access to Trella’s market insights and CRM platform, we are providing agencies with a powerful toolkit to optimize their financial performance, drive growth, and ultimately deliver better patient care,” said Michael J. Greenlee, founder and CEO of HealthRev Partners.

Jess Chew, GM, PAC Provider Growth at Trella Health, added, “The partnership underscores both companies’ commitment to supporting providers by delivering industry expertise and advanced technology to address the unique challenges facing home health and hospice agencies today. By combining our strengths, we can equip agencies to achieve better financial health and improve their competitive positioning.”

By leveraging their combined expertise, this partnership will help home health and hospice agencies uncover financial opportunities and optimize efficiencies — from referral growth to revenue management.

# # #

About HealthRev Partners

HealthRev Partners is a leading provider of revenue cycle management solutions for home health and hospice agencies, dedicated to improving financial performance and operational efficiency in the post-acute care sector.

About Trella Health

Trella Health’s unmatched market intelligence and purpose-built CRM allow post-acute providers, HME, and Infusion organizations to drive more effective performance and growth. Trella’s solutions allow post-acute, HME, and Infusion organizations to identify the highest-potential referral targets, evaluate new market opportunities, and monitor performance metrics. Paired with CRM and EHR integrations, business development teams can better manage referral relationships to advance their organizations with certainty by improving their sales and marketing strategy.

This press release was originally printed by Trella Health and is reprinted with permission. For more information or to reprint this content, please contact one of the media contacts listed above.

Patient Preference by Race or Nationality

Admin

This article provides updated information about a discrimination case filed against a home care agency by the EEOC. The Rowan Report published the initial press release and article last year.

by Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.

What to do When Patients Don't Want Caregivers of Certain Races or Nationalities

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sued ACARE HHC, Inc.; doing business as Four Seasons Licensed Home Health Care Agency in Brooklyn, New York. The EEOC claimed that the Agency removed home health aides from work assignments based on their race and national origin to accommodate clients’ preferences in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [EEOC v. ACARE HHC d/b/a/ Four Seasons Licensed Home Health Care, 23-cv-5760 (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York)]. 

This case recently settled, and Four Seasons will pay a whopping $400,000 in monetary relief to affected home health aides! The Agency must also update its internal policies and training processes related to requirements of the Civil Rights Act, stop assigning home health aides based on clients’ racial or nationality preferences, and provide semi-annual reports to the EEOC about any reports or complaints received about discrimination.

Aides Removed from Assignments

According to the EEOC, Four Seasons routinely responded to patients’ preferences by removing African American and Latino home health aides based on clients’ preferences regarding race and national origin. Aides removed from their assignments would be transferred to new assignments, if available, or, if no other assignments were available, would lose their employment altogether. The lawsuit asked for both compensatory and punitive damages, and for an injunction to prevent future discrimination based on race and national origin. The EEOC says that “Making work assignment decisions based on an employee’s race or national origin is against the law, including when these decisions are grounded in preferences of the employer’s clients.”

Patient Preference Race Nationality

As many providers know, patients’ preferences for certain types of caregivers are common. Experienced managers have been asked by patients not to provide caregivers who are, for example, “foreign.” Such requests should generally be rejected, especially when they involve discrimination based upon race, national origin, religion, or any other basis commonly used to treat groups of people differently. Legally and ethically, providers should not engage in such practices.

Exception to the Rule

There is one exception to this general rule that occurs when patients ask for caregivers of the same sex as the patient based upon concerns about bodily privacy. It is then acceptable to assign only same-sex caregivers to patients who have made such requests.

Risk Management

In addition to concerns about discrimination, providers must also be concerned about risk management when they honor such requests. Especially in view of increasing staff shortages, limitations on available caregivers may mean that patients’ needs cannot be met by staff members who are acceptable to patients. In view of staffing shortages, the fewer caregivers who are permitted to care for certain patients, the more likely it is that patients’ needs will go unmet. Unmet patient needs are, in turn, likely to significantly enhance the risk associated with providing care to patients.

Preferences at Home

Perhaps the pressure to honor patients’ requests is at its greatest when patients receive services at home. Patients who will accept any caregiver assigned to them in institutional settings somehow feel that they have the right to decide who may provide services in their homes. On the contrary, with the exception noted above, staff assignments should be made without regard to client preferences for services rendered at home, just as assignments are made in institutional settings.

Agency Response

How should managers respond when patients tell them not to assign any “foreign” nurses to them? First, they should explain that the organization does not discriminate and that to avoid assignments based on cultural or racial background may constitute unlawful discrimination. Then staff should explain that if limitations on caregivers were acceptable, the provider may be unable to render services to the patient at all because they may not have enough staff. The bottom line is that staff will be assigned without regard to patient preferences in order to prevent discrimination and to help ensure quality of care.  

Patients’ requests and managers’ responses must be specifically documented in patients’ charts. Documentation that says patients expressed preferences for certain caregivers or rejected certain types of caregivers is too general. Specific requests and responses of management must be documented. 

Monitoring the Patient

After patients have expressed what may amount to prejudice against certain groups of caregivers, managers must follow up and monitor for inappropriate behavior by patients directed at caregivers who are not preferred. Managers should be alert to the potential for this problem and should follow up with patients and caregivers to help ensure that caregivers are receiving the respect they deserve. Follow-up activities and on-going monitoring should also be specifically documented.

From the EEOC

“Employers cannot make job assignment decisions based on a client’s preference for a worker of a particular race or national origin. It is imperative for employers to have policies, training and other safeguards in place that help prevent a client’s prejudices from influencing their employment decisions.”

-EEOC Representative

Final Thoughts

Caregivers are a scarce commodity. Providers cannot afford to lose or alienate a single caregiver based upon discrimination or inappropriate behavior by patients.

 

# # #

Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.
Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.

Elizabeth Hogue is an attorney in private practice with extensive experience in health care. She represents clients across the U.S., including professional associations, managed care providers, hospitals, long-term care facilities, home health agencies, durable medical equipment companies, and hospices.

©2024 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in Healthcare at Home: The Rowan Report. One copy may be printed for personal use: further reproduction by permission only. editor@therowanreport.com

©2024 Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq. All rights reserved.

No portion of this material may be reproduced in any form without the advance written permission of the author.

CMS Ransomware Attack: Breach of PII

Admin

by Kristin Rowan, Editor

CMS Ransomware Attack

In mid-2023, a planned file transfer went awry when Clop claimed to have breached hundreds of companies that they later listed on a data leak site. Among the companies listed were Shell, UnitedHealthcare Student Resources, The University of Georgia, and Putnam Investments. Also compromised were government entities including the U.S. Department of Energy. According to Clop, data from military sources, children’s hospitals, and other .gov sites was also copied. The ransomware group alleges they deleted all information from government, military, and children’s hospital sites.

Unfortunately, there is no way to confirm whether all that information was indeed deleted. Earlier this year, Change Healthcare suffered a similar widespread breach that caused massive payment delays for months. CMS provided guidance during those delays. 

Underreporting of Attack

Many of the companies impacted by this attack chose to disclose the breach rather than negotiate with the ransomware attackers to retrieve the stolen data. When Bleeping Computer reached out to those companies immediately following the attacks, a number of them indicated that only a small number of people were effected and that no financial or identifiable information had been stolen. It seems, now, though that not all companies involved in the attack were on the initial list.

Wisconsin Physicians Service (WPS) health insurance corporation was among the companies not listed when news of this attack was first published. WPS provides Medicare administrative services to CMS, including handling Medicare Part A/B claims. In the first week of September, nearly 3-1/2 months after the attack, CMS and WPS started notifying beneficiaries whose protected health information (PHI) or other personally identifiable information (PII) may have been stolen during the attack.

1,000,000 Notifications

On July 28, 2023, CMS estimated 612,000 Medicare beneficiaries may have had PHI and/or PII exposed in the breach. That number has increased to almost 1 million. CMS and WPS are sending notifications to more than 950,000 people whose information has been compromised. The letter explains further:

May 31, 2023, MOVEit disclosed the breach to the public and released a patch.

June 2, 2023, WPS notified CMS of a data breach that occurred sometime between May 27 and May 31, 2023.

According to WPS, they applied the patch but did not observe any evidence of any files having been copied.

July 28, 2023 CMS sends an initial letter to beneficiaries whose information may have been affected.

May 2024, WPS acted on new information that led them to discover copied files from before the patch was deployed.

Of the portion of breached files that WPS studied, none were found to have personal information.

June 8, 2024, a different portion of the files showed personal information was contained in those files. This information includes:

  • Name
  • Social Security Number or Individual Taxpayer Identification Number
  • Date of Birth
  • Mailing Address
  • Gender
  • Hospital Account Number
  • Dates of Service
  • Medicare Beneficiary Identifier (MBI) and/or Health Insurance Claim Number
CMS Clop Ransomware Attack

Note: in the initial letter sent to beneficiaries in July of 2023, CMS also listed Healthcare Provider, Prescription Information, Insurance Claims, Policy Information, Subscriber Information, Health Benefits, and Enrollment Information as possibly having been leaked. These items were removed from the list in the September 2024 version of the same letter.

For those who received this notification, CMS and WPS offered a complimentary year of credit monitoring from Experian. CMS also advised members to request their free credit report from each of the credit reporting companies.

The letter also informed members that they would soon receive a new Medicare card with a new Medicare Number. 946,801 people received this notice.

CMS Ransomware Attack Victims Not Notified

On September 24, 2024, Bleeping Computer reported that on the same day CMS sent more than 900,000 letters to members, they also reported to the Department of Health and Human Services that the total number of people with information stolen was 3,112,815. CMS explains the difference by saying the larger number includes Medicare beneficiaries, people who are deceased, and people who were covered by other providers but whose information was included in WPS data collection used for provider audits in their role as Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs).

New MBIs and What it Means For You

According to a blog post dated September 26, 2024 from SimiTree, starting in mid-October, CMS will issue new Medicare cards with new Medicare Beneficiary Identifiers to the 946,801 Medicare beneficiaries who were previously identified as at risk and were notified of the breach. This may cause undue delays and other issues for home health and hospice providers.

Claim Rejection

If these beneficiaries use their existing MBI after the new one has been issued, providers could see rejections on NOAs, NOEs, OASIS submissions, and claims.

Urgent Reverification

Providers will need to reverify eligibility and update patient records in their EMR systems. Because providers were not notified of which beneficiaries were impacted, agencies will need to verify MBIs for every Medicare patient.

Possible Disruption

The full impact of reassigning MBIs to nearly 1 million Medicare beneficiaries is not yet known. Medicare has not clarified what will happen with claim processing for patients whose MBIs change during the claim processing for active patients. There are possibilities for delayed processing, delayed payments, and incorrect denial of services or payments due to the volume of MBIs changing at once.

How to Prepare

Our friends at SimiTree have some suggestions for how home health and hospice providers can prepare in advance for the MBI change coming around October 15-16, 2024.

  • Take Immediate Action – start reverifying eligibility for all Medicare patients now
  • Update Systems – ensure your EMR and other solutions in your tech stack are updated and ready to handle the changes
  • Train your Staff – make sure everyone on your team knows this change is coming and teach them new verification procedures so their patients aren’t left without care

CMS has not issued a statement about the impact of the MBI changes, but this story is ongoing and we will continue to monitor and report on any updates from WPS and CMS as well as look for additional information on the changes expected with the new MBIs.

# # #

Kristin Rowan, Editor
Kristin Rowan, Editor

Kristin Rowan has been working at Healthcare at Home: The Rowan Report since 2008. She has a master’s degree in business administration and marketing and runs Girard Marketing Group, a multi-faceted boutique marketing firm specializing in event planning, sales, and marketing strategy. She has recently taken on the role of Editor of The Rowan Report and will add her voice to current Home Care topics as well as marketing tips for home care agencies. Connect with Kristin directly kristin@girardmarketinggroup.com or www.girardmarketinggroup.com

©2024 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in Healthcare at Home: The Rowan Report. One copy may be printed for personal use: further reproduction by permission only. editor@therowanreport.com

Home Health in a Post-Chevron World

Admin

by Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.

The "Wicked Witch" Chevron is Gone

On June 28, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a decision of the Court in 1984 often referred to as “Chevron.” The Chevron case said that Courts must defer to administrative actions that are reasonable interpretations of ambiguous statutory language.

 In Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, however, the U.S. Supreme Court abandoned the decision in Chevron and said that:

    • The “deference that Chevron requires of courts reviewing agency action cannot be squared with” the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The APA “specified that courts, not agencies, will decide ‘all relevant questions of law’ arising on review of agency action…even those involving ambiguous laws – and set aside any such action inconsistent with the law as they interpret it.” 
    • The framers of the U.S. Constitution envisioned that the final “interpretation of the laws” would be “the proper and peculiar province of the courts.” 
    • The views of the executive branch should inform the judgment of the judiciary, not supersede it. 
    • “Chevron’s presumption is misguided because agencies have no special competence in resolving statutory ambiguities. Courts do.”

What Does it Mean for Providers?

The short answer is that we don’t know yet. It is unclear how the new standards of the Loper Bright decision will be applied and affect health care providers. The Supreme Court said that the recent Court decision does not call past cases into question that were based on Chevron, but existing regulations are not insulated from challenges. It is likely that several providers will “swing for the fences” for favorable rulings based on Loper Bright!

One possible “candidate” for disruption is the reliance of administrative law judges (ALJs) on Chapter 8 of the Medicare Program Integrity Manual. This section offers an overview of use of inferential statistics and statistical sampling to estimate overpayments in Medicare audits. Chapter 8 of the Manual is only nine pages long. ALJs routinely use this section of the Manual to hamper providers’ ability to mount a compelling defense that challenges auditors’ methods using widely accepted standards within the statistical community. Challenges to this practice based on Loper Bright may prevent ALJs from reliance on these sections of the Manual.

Chevron Deference Gone

Another possible target is the use of sub-statutory and even sub-regulatory guidance from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) by fraud and abuse enforcers to make determinations about illegal conduct, especially under the False Claims Act (FCA). Defendants arguably now have a better chance to challenge the basis of claims of illegal conduct in light of Loper Bright. 

The story of Loper Bright has not been written by any means. Surely providers should use this significant change in the law to their benefit whenever possible.

# # #

Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.
Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.

Elizabeth Hogue is an attorney in private practice with extensive experience in health care. She represents clients across the U.S., including professional associations, managed care providers, hospitals, long-term care facilities, home health agencies, durable medical equipment companies, and hospices.

©2024 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in Healthcare at Home: The Rowan Report. One copy may be printed for personal use: further reproduction by permission only. editor@therowanreport.com

©2024 Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq. All rights reserved.

No portion of this material may be reproduced in any form without the advance written permission of the author.

What are You Hiding?

Admin

by Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.

Bring on the Fraud Enforcers

We Have Nothing to Hide!

Oh, but you do! Statements like this from providers are cringe-worthy. If you have said it before, please don’t ever say it again.

Here’s why:

Fraud Enforcement

First, many providers think that when fraud enforcers are required to show intent they must show that providers sat down at their desks on a Friday afternoon, for example, and decided to engage in fraud. On the contrary, enforcers can demonstrate intent by showing that there was fraudulent conduct that providers knew about or should have known about. This is a game changer! It’s not hard to imagine fraudulent conduct that providers should have known about, but have not identified and corrected.

In addition, George Will points out in his Washington Post column, “Have you committed a felony yet? Probably so.” that the volume of legal requirements has skyrocketed. Here is what Mr. Will says:

“Less than a century ago, …a single volume contained all federal statutes. By 2018, they filled 54 volumes – about 60,000 pages. In the past 10 years, Congress has enacted about 2 million to 3 million words of law each year. The average length of a bill is nine times what it was in the 1950s. Agencies publish their proposals and final rules in the Federal Register, which began at 16 pages in 1936, and now expands by an average of more than 70,000 pages annually. By 2021, the Code of Federal Regulations filled about 200 volumes. And in a recent 10-year span, federal agencies churned out approximately 13,000 guidance documents.”

Mr. Will goes on to point out that ignorance of the law is, therefore, inevitable. Congress has added an average of 56 new federal crimes each year so that there are not more than 5,000 federal statutory crimes. In addition, at least 300,000 regulations of federal agencies include criminal sanctions.

 Here are some common examples:

Fraud Enforcement George Will
    • If you are a discharge planner/case manager in a hospital or skilled nursing facility you may not know about guidance from the Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that says you can’t accept gift cards from post-acute providers that want referrals.
    • If you are a home care/private duty provider and accept payments from the Medicaid Program, you may have repeatedly violated technical requirements, such as recording the time caregivers arrive and leave patients’ homes.
    • If you provide home health services and use the services of consulting physicians as Medical Directors, chances are very good that fraud enforcers will demonstrate that you violated at least one of a multitude of requirements that govern these relationships.
    • Finally, hospice providers know all too well that enforcers are going to claim that their patients are not terminally ill.

Mr. Will says in his column that James Madison predicted our current situation in which laws are “so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood” and “undergo such incessant changes that no man, who knows what the law is today, can guess what it will be tomorrow.” 

So, don’t even think that you have nothing to hide, much less say it!

 

# # #

Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.
Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.

Elizabeth Hogue is an attorney in private practice with extensive experience in health care. She represents clients across the U.S., including professional associations, managed care providers, hospitals, long-term care facilities, home health agencies, durable medical equipment companies, and hospices.

©2024 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in Healthcare at Home: The Rowan Report. One copy may be printed for personal use: further reproduction by permission only. editor@therowanreport.com

©2024 Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq. All rights reserved.

No portion of this material may be reproduced in any form without the advance written permission of the author.

NonCompete Agreements and What to do About Them

Admin

by Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.

What to do About Noncompete Agreements

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) published a final rule earlier this year that banned noncompete agreements. The final rule was effective on September 4, 2024.

 Requirements of the rule included:

    • A ban on new concompete agreements with all workers, including senior executives
    • Existing noncompete agreements could remain in force for senior executives if
      • they make more than $151,164 per year including salary, commissions, and performance bonuses but not including benefits, board and lodging; and
      • senior executives have authority to make policy decisions for the entire company
    • Existing noncompete agreements with workers other than senior executives are unenforceable after the rule is effective

There are a number of exceptions to the rule.

In the meanwhile, litigation

On July 23, 2024, a federal court in Pennsylvania refused to issue a preliminary injunction to prevent implementation of the final FTC rule. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania said that the statutory authority of the FTC to prevent unfair methods of competition under Section 5 of the FTC Act is not limited to procedural rules for adjudications and extends to substantive rulemaking [See ATS Tree Servs. v. Fed. Trade Comm’n, No. 24-1743 (E.D. Pa. July 23, 2024)].

Noncompete Agreements

But...

In early July, a federal court in Texas granted a preliminary injunction that delayed the effective date of the final rule. The Court declined to issue a nationwide injunction [See Ryan LLC v. Federal Trade Comm’n, No. 3:24-CV-00986-E (N.D. Tex. July 3, 2024)]. 

Then, on August 20, 2024, the Judge issued an order in the Ryan case that included a nationwide prohibition on implementation of the FTC rule. The basis of this decision is that the FTC does not have authority to order a ban, and that the rule was arbitrary and capricious. Based on this ruling, employers may continue to enter into and enforce non-compete agreements with workers.

 

Another but...

A number of state legislatures have enacted restrictions on use of noncompete agreements. As of August 21, 2024, four states ban the use of noncompete agreements and thirty-three states plus the District of Columbia restrict the use of these agreements. 

Providers must comply with applicable requirements in the states in which they conduct business. Providers who fail to do so risk enforcement action.  

Comfort Keepers, for example, agreed to pay $500,000 to resolve claims that it unfairly restricted workers’ mobility according to the California Department of Justice. Comfort Keepers’ Client Care Agreement that clients were required to sign before receiving care prevented clients from using, hiring, or soliciting current and former Comfort Keepers’ caregivers for up to one year after the termination of services. Violations required payment of $12,500.

So...

The current bottom line is that the FTC rule banning noncompete agreements is not in effect, but providers must comply with applicable state requirements or risk enforcement action.

Stay tuned for more!

# # #

Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.
Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.

Elizabeth Hogue is an attorney in private practice with extensive experience in health care. She represents clients across the U.S., including professional associations, managed care providers, hospitals, long-term care facilities, home health agencies, durable medical equipment companies, and hospices.

©2024 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in Healthcare at Home: The Rowan Report. One copy may be printed for personal use: further reproduction by permission only. editor@therowanreport.com

©2024 Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq. All rights reserved.

No portion of this material may be reproduced in any form without the advance written permission of the author.

Hospice Fraud Oversight

Admin

by Kristin Rowan, Editor

CMS Oversight in Fraud-Ridden States

In 2023, The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) cited research suggesting that hospices profit from fraud far too often. CMS has identified cases of hospices certifying benficiaries who are not terminally ill, providing little to no services, and still billing CMS. Four states have had rapid growth in fraudulent hospices: Arizona, California, Nevada, and Texas.

Churn-and-Burn

Some of the registered hospices had non-operational addresses. This information led to an investigation that resulted in evidence of the fraud dubbed “Churn and Burn.” This scheme involves registering a new hospice and billing for services until there is an audit or the agency maxes out on yearly payments. Then, the hospice closes, keeps the money, registers for a new Medicare billing number, and starts all over again.

Program Integrity Strategy

As a result of  the findings of this research, CMS put more effort behing the hospice program integrity strategy to find and address fraudulent activity. Part of the strategy was unannounced visits to hospices nationwide. Hospices not active at listed addresses were deactivated and Medicare billing privileges were revoked. Of the more than 7,000 hospices visited, 400 had potential administrative action pending.

Enhanced Oversight

In the four states identified as having higher instances of fraud, CMS implemented a provisional period of enhanced oversight. During the provisional period, CMS conducted a medical review prior to payment for hospices in these states that have identified problems.

Nationwide Pilot Project

In addition to the provisional period for the four identified states, CMS started a pilot project to review hospice claims after a patient’s intitial 90 days of hospice care. This pilot project was not limited to the four states, but was implemented nationwide. CMS launched the program to help inform medical reviews in determining whether hospices are submitting claims for eligible patients.

Regulatory Changes

CMS also proposed some regulatory changes to combat hospice fraud. Some of these regulatory changes were initially suggested by hospice providers. The proposals include:

Hospice Fraud
    • Prohibiting the transfer of Medicare billing privileges of a new hospice for 36 months
    • Clarifying the definition of “Managing Employee” to include the administrator and medical director of a hospice
    • Implementing a Special Focus Program to increase oversight on poor-performing hospices that have ongoing health and safety deficiencies
    • Adding criminal background checks for owners when they initially enroll for Medicare billing privileges.

Prepayment Review Expanded

CMS has just announced that they will expand the prepayment review process in the four states beginning in September, 2024. Information from CMS is limited and states that prepayment review volume will start low to protect compliant hospices, but will increase if a hospice is found to be non-compliant. Consequences for non-compliance includes delays in payment, extended review, or additional administrative actions.

According to preliminary information we received from a hospice consultant, the expanded program puts all new hospices or hospices with ownership changes into prepayment review even if they have not had identified problems. 

We have reached out to both CMS and some of our expert hospice consultants to get more information and will update this story as information becomes available.

# # #

Kristin Rowan, Editor
Kristin Rowan, Editor

Kristin Rowan has been working at Healthcare at Home: The Rowan Report since 2008. She has a master’s degree in business administration and marketing and runs Girard Marketing Group, a multi-faceted boutique marketing firm specializing in event planning, sales, and marketing strategy. She has recently taken on the role of Editor of The Rowan Report and will add her voice to current Home Care topics as well as marketing tips for home care agencies. Connect with Kristin directly kristin@girardmarketinggroup.com or www.girardmarketinggroup.com

©2024 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in Healthcare at Home: The Rowan Report. One copy may be printed for personal use: further reproduction by permission only. editor@therowanreport.com

Meet Dr. Steve Landers, MD

Admin

Get to know the new NAHC-NHPCO Alliance CEO

Steven Landers, MD, MPH

Dr. Steve Landers

Dr. Landers named CEO for joint NAHC NHPCO. A recognized leader and innovator in home health, primary care and aging services, Dr. Steven “Steve” Landers brings almost two decades of experience as a physician, executive leader and public health policy advocate to lead The Alliance as its first Chief Executive Officer.

Physician

As a board-certified physician in family medicine, geriatric medicine, and hospice and palliative medicine, Dr. Landers has dedicated his career to seeking home- and community-based solutions for ill and aging Americans. He is a champion of the impactful role home care and hospice play in the health and lives of communities, acknowledging that as an aging nation, providing compassionate, dignified and cost-effective systems of care to patients is critical.

Education

Dr. Landers graduated from Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, where his training included a family medicine residency at Case Western and a geriatric medicine fellowship at the Cleveland Clinic. He also attended the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, where he focused on health policy and management. He received a bachelor of arts in political science from Indiana University in Bloomington.

Early Career

Early in his career, Dr. Landers based his clinical practice on providing health care through house calls and has made thousands of home visits, primarily to low-mobility patients. While in this setting, he saw the need to better connect home care and hospice to the broader health care system and medical community. He understood that to improve patient care, he would need to understand and play a leading role at the intersection of clinical work, health policy and systems of care. He pursued a master’s degree in public health, which contributed to his passion for influencing federal and state policy to improve health care delivery to vulnerable patients.

On The Board

Dr. Landers has served on numerous boards and committees in the home-based care policy space, including past appointments to the boards of directors of the National Association for Home Care and Hospice, American Academy of Home Care Medicine, the Partnership for Quality Home Health, and the Alliance for Home Health Quality and Innovation (now Research Institute for Home Care). He has represented these organizations by engaging policymakers, including meeting with members of Congress; providing committee testimonies for Congress and state legislatures; and discussing home care policies and regulations with the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services, the administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Payment Advisory Commission officials, and federal agency staff.

Home Care

Prior to joining The Alliance, Dr. Landers served in several executive leadership roles. He was the director of home care at the Cleveland Clinic, and for more than 11 years was the president and CEO of the Visiting Nurse Association Health Group, Inc. — one of the oldest, largest and highly respected home health, hospice and community health organizations in the country.

As a renowned author and thought leader in the care at home sector, his work has been published in the New England Journal of Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association and the Huffington Post. The work of Dr. Landers and his team to prioritize at-home vaccines for homebound seniors during the COVID-19 pandemic also has been featured by major news outlets such as ABC’S Good Morning America and CBS Mornings with Gayle King.

Personal Life

Steve lives in Little Silver, New Jersey, with his wife, Allison, and their three sons. His hobbies include golfing, fishing, hiking, traveling, enjoying good food and watching horse racing. When he is not taking part in these activities, you can find him cheering on his sports teams — the Browns, Cavaliers, Guardians and Indiana Hoosiers.

This bio originally appeared on the NAHC-NHPCO Alliance web site. It is reproduced in The Rowan Report by permission. It may be freely reproduced.

It’s Official! NAHC NHPCO Alliance Name New CEO

Admin

WASHINGTON D.C. Steven Landers, MD, MPH, has been named the inaugural Chief Executive Officer of the newly merged NAHC-NHPCO Alliance (The Alliance). A recognized national leader and innovator in home health, primary care and aging services, Dr. Landers brings almost two decades of experience as a physician, executive leader and health policy advocate to The Alliance, which represents care at home and community providers across the country. (Read more about Dr. Landers at our accompanying article in this week’s issue.)

Dr. Landers has dedicated his career to seeking home- and community-based health care solutions for people of all ages. As a board-certified physician in family medicine, geriatric medicine, and hospice and palliative medicine, he is a champion of the impactful role health care at home plays in the health and wellbeing of communities, acknowledging that as an aging nation, providing compassionate, dignified and cost-effective systems of care to patients is critical.

“The Alliance members provide a wide range of high-quality home- and community-based services that promote comfort, dignity and independence. I’m so proud to become a part of this organization, and am eager to serve,” said Dr. Landers. “I’ve had the opportunity in my career to see the health care industry from many vantage points, and in this new role with The Alliance, I will use all that I have learned to make a difference for our members as we continue to expand to meet the growing public needs for our care.”

Prior to joining The Alliance, Dr. Landers served in several executive leadership roles. He was the director of home care at the Cleveland Clinic, and for more than 11 years was the president and CEO of the Visiting Nurse Association Health Group, Inc. — one of the oldest, largest and highly respected home health, hospice and community health organizations in the country. During his most recent tenure as the president and CEO of Hebrew SeniorLife, he led an organization known for superior senior living, geriatric health care, research and teaching.

Dr. Landers has served on numerous boards and committees in the care at home space and has represented organizations by engaging policymakers, including meeting with members of Congress; providing committee testimonies for Congress and state legislatures; and discussing home care policies and regulations with the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services, the administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Payment Advisory Commission officials, and federal agency staff.

“Providing leadership around policy and advocacy efforts is critical to our mission at The Alliance,” said Transition Board Chair Ken Albert. “Throughout his career, Dr. Landers served the field as an effective policy advocate, shaping policy at both the state and federal levels. We are thrilled to welcome him as our inaugural CEO, and I know he will build an extraordinary team to offer value for our members.”

Steve Landers NAHC NHPCO Alliance CEO

Early in his career, Dr. Landers based his clinical practice on providing health care through house calls and thousands of home visits, primarily to low-mobility patients. While in this setting, he saw the need to connect home care and hospice to the broader health care system and medical community. He understood that to improve patient care, health care providers need to explore and thrive at the intersection of clinical work, health policy and systems of care. He pursued a master’s degree in public health, which contributed to his passion for influencing federal and state legislation to improve health care delivery to home-based patients.

“Dr. Landers’ rich and diversified experience makes him the ideal candidate to lead our membership as our organization evolves,” said Alliance Transition Board Vice Chair Melinda Gruber. “Working alongside community health workers and within our patients’ homes, he understands what we need as frontline caregivers and advocates.”

Dr. Landers is a graduate of Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, where his training included a family medicine residency at Case Western and a geriatric medicine fellowship at the Cleveland Clinic. He also attended the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, where he focused on health policy and management. Additionally, he received a bachelor of arts in political science from Indiana University in Bloomington.

# # #

About the NAHC-NHPCO Alliance 

The NAHC-NHPCO Alliance brings together the National Association for Home Care & Hospice (NAHC) and the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization (NHPCO), two organizations with more than 90 years of combined experience serving providers of quality care in the home to form one new association. This historic alliance creates a national organization representing providers of home care, home health, hospice, and palliative care, forming the most powerful voice and resource the care-at-home community has seen. The integration process underway is expected to continue through the beginning of 2025. While leadership explores a permanent name, the new organization is operating under the interim name the NAHC-NHPCO Alliance.

Keep track of updated news on the NAHC and NHPCO websites.

This news release originally appeared in The Rowan Report. by permission of the National Association for Home Health and Hospice. It may be freely reprinted.

HHVBP Model Payments Begin January 1, 2025

Admin

by Kristin Rowan, Editor

Background on the HHVBP Model

The Home Health Value Based Purchasing (HHVBP) Model, implemented by CMS in 2016, began in nine states. The goal is “to provide incentives for better quality care, to study new quality and efficiency measures, and to enhance the reporting process.” It may also provide new avenues for payment models.

According to the CMS website, the original HHVBP Model, launched in nine states, improved an average of 4.6 percent HHA performance scores and saved Medicare $141 million. Additionally, the model lowered unplanned hospitalizations for acute care and reduced skilled nursing facility (SNF) stays.

HHVBP Model Expansion

From the initial study, CMS surmised that expanding the model would increase performance, increase savings, and further reduce hospitalizations and SNF stays. Early in 2021, CMS announced the nationwide expansion of the HHVBP Model.

The expanded model started on January 1, 2022. In its first expansion year, CMS provided training and allowed HHAs time to adjust practices based on HHVBP expectations and requirements. During the transition year, HHA performance did not risk future payment rates.

HHVBP Model Performance Year

January 1, 2023 marked the beginning of the performance year, in which all HHA results would impact future payments. CMS will adjust fee-for-service payments based on performance relative to other HHAs. CMS groups HHAs into cohorts determined by beneficiary count the previous year. Cohorts include large- and small-volume for agencies above and below 60 unique HHCAHPS eligible beneficiaries, respectively.

Using data already reported by HHAs through the Home Health Quality Reporting Program (HH QRP) and HHCAHPS surveys, CMS compares an HHAs data to similar agencies. Based on this comparison, CMS adjusts future payments between -5% and 5% for fee-for-service payments.

Interim Performance Report

The Interim Performance Report (IPR) is a quarterly report with performance data for all HHAs participating in the HHVBP Model. Active HHAs that were Medicare certified before January 1, 2022, are eligible for payment adjustment, and meet the minimum threshold of data for at least one quality measure receive the reports. Reports are available at iQIES. Registration on the portal is required.

CMS publishes new reports every quarter and eligible HHAs should receive an email when a new report is available. 

Points System

Payment adjustments for the next calendar year are based on an HHAs performance in the last report. For CY 2025, payment adjustments will use the Final Annual Performance Report, published 30 days prior to each payment year.

The process to determine your HHAs ranking in relations to the other HHAs in your cohort can be confusing and has many steps. Payment adjustments are based on “Care Points”, which are calculated on a weighted scale, using the higher of the agency’s earned achievement points or improvement points. An HHA must have at least 20 quality stays for claims-based measures and at least 40 surveys for the HHCAHPS survey-based measure.

Achievement Points

Achievement points are earned by scoring above the median performance on each quality measure (better than half of the agencies in your cohort) and dividing that by the difference between your score and the top 10 percent in your cohort.

HHVBP Model Calculate Achievement Points
Improvement Points

Improvement points are calculated using an HHAs prior year performance measure, current measure and the mean score of the top 10 percent of agencies in your cohort.

HHVBP Model Calculate Improvement Points
Care Points

Care points are the higher of Achievement Points or Improvement Points for each quality measure. Each quality measure is weighted differently in each category of OASIS-based Measures, Claims-based Measures, and Survey-based Measures.

The higher of each agency’s achievement and improvement scores is multiplied by its assigned weight to calculate the weighted score within each measure. Each measure then has its own weight. OASIS- and Claims-based measures each count for 35% of the total score while Survey-based measures make up 30% of the final score.

The HHA score is measured against all HHAs in the cohort to determine your rank. Where your weighted points fall in comparison with the rest of your cohort determines whether your next payment cycle will go up or down by as much as 5 percent. 

HHVBP Model Weighted Scores

Public Reporting

Your scores will not only be used to determine your payment increase or decrease. These reports will be made public as well. CMS will publicly report each quality measure’s benchmark and achievement threshold. For every HHA that qualifies for a payment adjustment, CMS will also publish:

      • Measure results and improvement thresholds
      • Total Performance Score and Percentile Ranking
      • Payment adjustment percentage

Scoring well on the Achievement and Improvement markers for each measure may offer an HHA an opportunity to gain more referrals, recruit talented clinicians, and gain a reputation for quality care.

On the other hand, scoring low may hurt an agency irreparably. HHAs who think there is an error in the initial reporting can submit a recalculation request within 15 days of the publishing of a preview report. Based on CMS’s decision, HHAs have 15 days to submit a reconsideration request if they submitted a recalculation request and are not happy with the decision. If the HHA is still not in agreement with the decision of the reconsideration request, they have seven days to submit a request for administrative review.

Next Steps

According to the information we can find on CMS, these reports will be published quarterly. Logically, then, the recalculation requests can also be submitted quarterly along with reconsideration and administrative review requests. We will continue to follow this and provide updated deadlines to submit requests as we find them.

# # #

Kristin Rowan, Editor
Kristin Rowan, Editor

Kristin Rowan has been working at Healthcare at Home: The Rowan Report since 2008. She has a master’s degree in business administration and marketing and runs Girard Marketing Group, a multi-faceted boutique marketing firm specializing in event planning, sales, and marketing strategy. She has recently taken on the role of Editor of The Rowan Report and will add her voice to current Home Care topics as well as marketing tips for home care agencies. Connect with Kristin directly kristin@girardmarketinggroup.com or www.girardmarketinggroup.com

©2024 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in Healthcare at Home: The Rowan Report. One copy may be printed for personal use: further reproduction by permission only. editor@therowanreport.com

Cat on a Hot Tin…Keyboard?

Admin

by Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.

HIPAA Violation

HIPAA violation: Trent James Russell was convicted in federal Court on charges of obtaining another person’s health care information in violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Russell was employed by an organ transplant organization. As a transplant coordinator, he had access to electronic medical records at George Washington University Hospital in Washington, DC.

Justice Ginberg

In January of 2019, Russell accessed the medical records of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg even though Justice Ginsburg had not been referred as a possible organ donor. He took a screenshot of the records and then posted them on a message board called “4chan.” Ginsberg’s records quickly appeared on Twitter and YouTube, including her name and the exact dates and times when she received radiology, oncology, and surgical treatments at the Hospital between 2014 and 2018.

Hospital officials traced the search of Ginsburg’s records to one of Russell’s home computers. As soon as Russell was identified as a suspect, his access was denied by the Hospital. His request to have access restored was also denied. 

Tall Tales RBG

The Cat Made me Violate HIPAA Laws

Russell initially told federal agents that his “cats had run across his keyboard.” He later characterized this statement as a “nervous joke.” Russell said that he had no idea how his computer searched terms that produced the Justice’s records and that “everyone makes typos.”

Online users who viewed Ginsberg’s records promoted various antisemitic conspiracy theories. One theory was that Ginsburg had died in late 2018 and that democrats were hiding her death in order to deny President Trump an opportunity to appoint her replacement. A search of Russell’s computer also revealed a search for the term “dirty jew.”

An FBI agent said that she found an image on Russell’s hard drive that mimicked a poster for the film “Weekend at Bernie’s.” The caption said “Weekend at Ginsburg’s” and showed leaders of the U.S. House of Representatives propping Ginsburg up from both sides in a morbid play on how the movie characters covered up Bernie’s death so that they could use his beach house.

Ignorance of HIPAA Law is not a Defense

But, he didn’t even have that. The Chief Executive Officer of the transplant organization at the time the access occurred testified that coordinators like Russell had “no business being inside the chart” of patients who had not been referred to the organization. The CEO said that Russell was certainly aware of this prohibition because of numerous agreements he signed with his employer and the extensive training he received.

Lessons Learned

There are several important takeaways from this case. First, it is important to note that Russell had extensive training about the requirements of the HIPAA Privacy Rule. He also agreed to comply with these requirements. The temptation is great, but employees must be reminded not to succumb. In addition, practitioners should take note of the fact that Russell was criminally prosecuted. Since he was convicted, he faces up to twenty-two years in prison and fines in the tens of thousands of dollars. Serious business!

# # #

Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.
Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.

Elizabeth Hogue is an attorney in private practice with extensive experience in health care. She represents clients across the U.S., including professional associations, managed care providers, hospitals, long-term care facilities, home health agencies, durable medical equipment companies, and hospices.

©2024 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in Healthcare at Home: The Rowan Report. One copy may be printed for personal use: further reproduction by permission only. editor@therowanreport.com

©2024 Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq. All rights reserved.

No portion of this material may be reproduced in any form without the advance written permission of the author.

Startup Offers $3 Caregiver Recruiting Service

Admin

by Tim Rowan, Editor Emeritus

Costly Caregiver Recruiting

Out of desperation, the nationwide caregiver shortage has driven many Home Care agency owners to resort to expensive recruiting tools. How much, for example, do you spend on services such as Indeed, ZipRecruiter, or Monster, each of which charges per-click?

A Needle in a Stack of Needles

You know how job seekers use these services, correct? They complete one resumè and send it to dozens, if not hundreds, of companies every day. When you respond to their inquiry, thinking they have a keen interest in applying for your caregiver position, they typically respond, “Now, which one are you?”

Caregiver Recruiting GoInstaCare

Caregiver Recruiting Database Emerges

In the process of building a web site and app for families to find in-home caregiver services, former Home Care agency owner Amit Shrivastava suddenly found himself with more job seekers than he could place in homes, and this after launching in only five states. His solution was to open his collection of resumés to other agencies. After we tested his idea, we believe it will one day give Indeed and the others a run for their money.

Simple Process with Customized Results

After a $200 set-up fee, GoInstaCare users can look at the names, certificates, personality types, and work preferences of 10,000 caregivers, a list that continues to grow. An easy filtering system allows the user to narrow the list by certification, gender, zip code, and experience. Each entry displays whether the caregiver has a driver’s license, his or her own car, languages spoken, and ratings from past employers and clients.

GoInstaCare performs background checks so the hiring agency knows that the caregiver has a higher degree of passing their own checks. By selecting filters, a hiring agency can focus its search to the qualifications it requires. Once the 10,000 names are filtered down to a manageable half dozen or so, the hiring agency pays $3 each to download their contact information. At that point, GoInstaCare steps back and leaves the rest of the onboarding process to their participating agency.

"Uberized" Employer

For Caregivers

Like its counterparts in ride shares, delivery services, virtual assistants, and other gig economy positions, GoInstaCare allows caregivers to set their own schedules, provide flexible rates, get paid daily, and accept or decline a job at will. Caregivers are reviewed by clients and their families directly on the GoInstaCare platform.

For Agencies

The gig job nature of the platform gives agencies the option to cover a gap in scheduling or temporarily raise employee numbers without the hiring, onboarding, training, and retention of a full-time or part-time employee. Agencies can also save a caregiver profile to share with a team, or for future reference.

Where to Find GoInstaCare

As this is written, GoInstaCare has spread to five states, Texas, Illinois, Michigan, New York, and Florida. Mr. Shrivastava told The Rowan Report there are plans to continue to expand.

There are two ways to get in touch with Amit Shrivastava. Click on this link to schedule a product demo: calendly.com/goinstacare-sales/meeting. Or sign up to use the service here: Goinstacare.com/partner-with-us

Caregiver Recruiting GoInstaCare

# # #

Tim Rowan, Editor Emeritus

Tim Rowan is a 30-year home care technology consultant who co-founded and served as Editor and principal writer of this publication for 25 years. He continues to occasionally contribute news and analysis articles under The Rowan Report’s new ownership. He also continues to work part-time as a Home Care recruiting and retention consultant. More information: RowanResources.com
Tim@RowanResources.com

©2024 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in The Rowan Report. One copy may be printed for personal use: further reproduction by permission only. editor@therowanreport.com