Medicare Advantage Stock Prices After Trump Elected

by Kristin Rowan, Editor

Will the Change in Leadership Usher in a Change in Reimbursement Rates?

As in any election year, we have been bombarded with promises, predictions, and pandering from senate and house hopefuls as well as presidential candidates from every party. Each of them found platform issues that resonated with their followers. In turn, they have accused their opponents of all manner of sin. 

Now that the election has passed and the lame duck session of congress has begun, analysts have started looking to January and how election results may impact different industries. Analysts believe Trump, along with congressional Republicans, will aggressively push Medicare Advantage. One researcher predicts that traditional Medicare will “wither on the vine.” 

Privatization

Opposition to our current health care and insurance system often advocate for a single-payer system that is seen in places like England and Canada. Naysayers refer to this as the “socialization” of medicine, referring to socialist and communist governments. Privatization, on the other hand, moves healthcare out of the hands of the government and into the hands of privately held, usually for-profit, health insurance companies. Medicare Advantage has quietly moved more than 50% of all Medicare eligible patients to a privatized system. Senior policy analyst at Paragon Health Institute, Joe Alabanese believes that the Trump administration and a republican Congress would be “more friendly” to the idea of privatized health care. 

Insurer Stock Prices

Whether the stock prices just before and after election day are predictive of things to come remains to be seen. For now, the information before us is this:

    • Between Nov 1 and Nov 7, Humana Inc. had the largest increase in stock prices at 10.7%
    • UnitedHealth Group Inc. rose 5.1% in the same time period
    • Both companies had greater stock increases than the average across S&P
    • Elevance Health was in keeping with the rest of the S&P with an increase of 3.6%
    • Molina Healthcare, Inc. and The Cigna Group dropped 0.2% and 0.4%, respectively
Medicare Advantage Stock Trump

Analysts say the jumps are in keeping with expectations that Republican control in Congress and in the White House will be beneficial for Medicare Advantage

Medicare Advantage Stock Trump<br />

Final Thoughts

It’s no secret that The Rowan Report is not a fan of Medicare Advantage. Specifically, the sales tactics used on the elderly and infirmed are predatory and the denial rate is criminal. The more eligible patients sign up for Medicare Advantage the less they will receive the care they need. Further, the more Medicaid has to supplement the cost of Medicare Advantage, the more home care agencies will suffer. Nationally, the more CMS regulates payment rates, pre-authorizations, and denial rates by privatizing Medicaid, the worse off our entire healthcare system will be.

With the state and national associations, we will continue to advocate on behalf of care at home agencies and their patients. And we hope you will too, regardless of who is in office. We have support at the federal level and we will continue to fight the good fight.

# # #

Kristin Rowan, Editor
Kristin Rowan, Editor

Kristin Rowan has been working at Healthcare at Home: The Rowan Report since 2008. She has a master’s degree in business administration and marketing and runs Girard Marketing Group, a multi-faceted boutique marketing firm specializing in event planning, sales, and marketing strategy. She has recently taken on the role of Editor of The Rowan Report and will add her voice to current Home Care topics as well as marketing tips for home care agencies. Connect with Kristin directly kristin@girardmarketinggroup.com or www.girardmarketinggroup.com

©2024 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in Healthcare at Home: The Rowan Report. One copy may be printed for personal use: further reproduction by permission only. editor@therowanreport.com

Home Health and Hospice Face Another Election Year

by Tim Rowan, Editor Emeritus

Home Health Hospice and the Election

It happens every four years. Once the Olympic torch has been extinguished, Americans turn their attention from athletics to politics, specifically to choosing their next President. While watching the Harris/Trump debate this week, my thoughts turned to the dilemma faced by Home Health, Hospice, and Home Care owners, managers, and field staff.

U.S. voters can make their voting decision after taking into consideration the policy proposals of each candidate and analyzing which policies might better benefit themselves or their businesses. Voters can also vote along party lines, regardless of the candidate or their policies. And then, there is always a percentage who set their personal advantages aside and vote for the candidate they believe to be better for the nation as a whole.

home health hospice election

Choice 2024

This may be where our healthcare sector finds itself this year. Is what is best for the country also best for Home Health, Hospice, Palliative Care, and Home Care? Or might the needs of one diverge from the needs of the other? If the latter, which choice is the higher calling?

In this week’s debate, the broad healthcare issue merited little more than a mention and some vague promises. Post-acute care was apparently unimportant or unknown to both candidates. Had a clever writer been tasked with summarizing that moment, it might have read, “Unhealthy Healthcare Debate Fails to Heal.” What did we learn, and where does it leave us?

Balancing Your Responsibilities

Voters have twin responsibilities, each as simple as it is profound. First, to decide whether to base their choice on party alone, on personal or business gain, or for the benefit of all. This includes whether the same vote will accomplish both or whether it is necessary to pick one or the other. The second responsibility is to research the issues and each candidate’s position on each issue. An informed voter is a patriotic voter.

Taylor Knows Best?

home health hospice election
Once a voter has committed to the basis for their choice, the second responsibility is met by reading. Oddly, this retired grandfather cannot express that idea any better than a 34-year-old pop singer. In her September 10 endorsement statement, Taylor Swift said:

“Now is a great time to do your research on the issues at hand and the stances these candidates take on the topics that matter to you the most. As a voter, I make sure to watch and read everything I can about their proposed policies and plans for this country. I’ve done my research, and I’ve made my choice. Your research is all yours to do, and the choice is yours to make.”

History May Repeat Itself

Home Health and Hospice are deeply dependent on government spending. In the immediate future, MedPAC and CMS can be counted upon to continue to squeeze profit margins as they shift their gaze from services to outcomes. For more than two decades, CMS has enacted rules that shrink the total number of Home Health agencies. This happened across four administrations with different political ideologies. The result is agencies serving the same number of beneficiaries with the same number of nurses while supporting fewer executives.

The meeting of self-interest and national interest may be stronger in the Home Care sector. Caregiver shortage pushes higher hourly pay rates, which pushes higher hourly fees, which decreases the number of clients willing and able to pay. An economy that creates more spendable income or savings means the threshold between “can’t afford it” and “we’ll make it work” lowers.

No, This is not an Endorsement

I guess the bottom line is that I agree with the young pop singer. Like her, I have done my research and made my decision. I urge you to do the same. Read everything you can from the source, if you can. Avoid the temptation to rely on anyone else’s summaries of candidate positions and plans. Think “patriotism” first and “what’s in it for me” second. When in doubt, revisit the words of speechwriter Ted Sorensen, whose brilliant poetry was etched permanently into American history through the voice of John F. Kennedy. “And so, my fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country.”

# # #

Tim Rowan, Editor Emeritus

Tim Rowan is a 30-year home care technology consultant who co-founded and served as Editor and principal writer of this publication for 25 years. He continues to occasionally contribute news and analysis articles under The Rowan Report’s new ownership. He also continues to work part-time as a Home Care recruiting and retention consultant. More information: RowanResources.com
Tim@RowanResources.com

©2024 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in Healthcare at Home: The Rowan Report. One copy may be printed for personal use: further reproduction by permission only. editor@therowanreport.com