Interoperability: The Unreachable Dream

by Kristin Rowan, Editor

Interoperability

The Unreachable Dream

Healthcare and care at home have been reaching for interoperability for decades. When I started working in the care at home industry, there was a learning curve for terminologies, abbreviations (oy! with the abbreviations already!), and the pain points experienced by agencies and vendors. Interoperability was at the top of that list. 2009, the first full year I worked in care at home, was the year Congress mandated EHRs and data exchange. The mandate did not accomplish much. Incompatible data structures limit post-acute care data to the most recent health event, not the patient’s full medical record.

Data Exchange

Interoperability

Following the EHR mandate, Congress continued to add regulations and rules to advance data exchange. Starting with HIPAA in 1996, interoperability advanced as follows:

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ensures patient data stays private both within a healthcare system and during data exchange

Congress mandated the use of EHRs throughout healthcare

HITECH Act launched Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) that support secure exchange of information between health systems

Health Level 7 (HL7) designed a framework that establishes protocols for data exchange

Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR), an updated of HL7, enables processes in 84% of hospitals and 61% of clinician offices

21st Century Care Act allows patients to access their own medical information and requires developers to publish APIs and ensure all data in the patient health record is accessible through that API

Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA) lists principles, terms, and conditions to standardize data

CMS Interoperability Framework pushes interoperability nationwide through improved data quality; advanced technology; data aggregation; and alignment of data, tools, and measures

Following the EHR mandate, Congress continued to add regulations and rules to advance data exchange. Starting with HIPAA in 1996, interoperability advanced as follows:Interoperability

  • Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ensures patient data stays private both within a healthcare system and during data exchange
  • Congress mandated the use of EHRs throughout healthcare
  • HITECH Act launched Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) that support secure exchange of information between health systems
  • Health Level 7 (HL7) designed a framework that establishes protocols for data exchange
  • Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR), an updated of HL7, enables processes in 84% of hospitals and 61% of clinician offices
  • 21st Century Care Act allows patients to access their own medical information and requires developers to publish APIs and ensure all data in the patient health record is accessible through that API
  • Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA) lists principles, terms, and conditions to standardize data
  • CMS Interoperability Framework pushes interoperability nationwide through improved data quality; advanced technology; data aggregation; and alignment of data, tools, and measures

Thirty Years Later

Despite the laws, regulations, frameworks, and mandates, interoperability is not much better than it was in 1996. I had an experience this year that both enlightened and infuriated me. I switched health insurance plans for a variety of reasons. My new plan didn’t cover most of the doctors, hospitals, and health systems I had been using for many many years. So in February, I found a new PCP and had the standard start of care visit to establish my health history: current conditions, past conditions, past surgeries & procedures, current medications, etc. I requested referrals to new specialists and updates to prescriptions. My PCP performed a “complete physical” that was nothing more than a cursory overview. And then I waited.

Interoperability

The Waiting Game

And waited…and waited…. I thought all these organizations and standards were supposed to make this easier. Still, I waited.

  • I waited for an “invitation” to my PCPs portal to see my visit notes and test results
  • I waited for my PCP to send referrals to new specialists
  • I waited for my health insurance provider to inevitably tell me the specialist wasn’t covered under my plan
  • I waited for a new referral from my PCP
  • I waited for appointments, results, and recommendations
  • I waited for access to new patient portals
  • I waited for the portal to figure out how to give me access to three different providers in the same app
    • (spoiler alert: I have to log in to the same app three different ways to access three different providers; my providers can see all the information in one place, but I can’t)
  • I waited for test results to appear in each portal; some I had to call and request, some I’m still waiting for

Data Exchange "Advancements"

According to my research, 84% of hospitals and 61% of clinicians are currently using FHIR, designed to improve interoperability between different health systems using standard data formats and APIs.

Last month I had an appointment. Correction: I thought I had an appointment for an imaging scan. I thought this because the scheduling nurse called me to confirm the appointment day, time, and location. When I arrived, the check-in nurse couldn’t find me in their system.

It wasn’t just that she didn’t see my appointment. No, it was that she couldn’t find me at all. (We later discovered it was still pending because the imaging department never confirmed the appointment after the scheduling nurse added it.) 

She could see no current or future appointments. She could see no past appointments because they were booked a different way. She couldn’t find any record of me at all. You see, my record started in the next building over.

Error 404: Not Found

Every one of these facilities is in the same healthcare system. (Think ACME hospital, ACME imaging, ACME specialist doctor, and ACME lab) Every office is part of the same healthcare system and none of them can see each other’s information. ACME hospital can’t see the schedule for ACME imaging and can’t schedule imaging appointments outside the hospital. For that, I have to call ACME imaging.

  • But wait! The doctor wrote my referral for ACME hospital, not ACME imaging. I need a new referral.
  • But wait! Neither the healthcare system nor the specialist can write a new referral. My payer will only accept a referral from my PCP.
  • But wait! My PCP has no idea what the referral is for, how it was written, or where it’s supposed to go because my PCP can’t access my records from the healthcare system.

This is advanced data exchange using FHIR, HIE, TEFCA, and QHIN. My health system uses our local HIE and CommonWell Health Alliance, an interoperability network designated as a federal QHIN. Apparently, this ensures the health system can share data with participating providers, but not with themselves.

Home Health is Even Further Behind the Curve

After so many years, so many advancements, and so many regulations, interoperability is no more “solved” than it was in 2009. Even the health systems that are using all the tools aren’t even internally interoperable.

Home Health has an even harder time attaining interoperability. 

  • It is more difficult for HHAs to access patient information, which usually has to be manually imported into the home health EHR
  • Patient consent is required, but HHAs often deal with patients who don’t have the capacity to consent
  • Despite the requirement of APIs, most health information is spread out across multiple systems and the HHA only get information from the referring facility
  • Nearly 80% of HHAs use an EHR
  • Only 28% of HHAs are electronically exchanging information with outside facilities
  • Only 18% can integrate shared data into automated workflows
  • HHAs did not receive the financial incentives that larger healthcare systems got to push interoperability
  • TEFCA participation is not mandatory, slowing down the process of approving a data connection and exchange

Many legacy EHRs have met significant challenges moving into interoperability. Competitors in the space had no financial incentive to create standard languages and formatting designed to share information. HHAs are left with two choices: 

The costly, time-consuming task of reviewing, selecting, and onboarding an entirely new EHR –or–

Piece together workarounds with multiple 3rd party or internal solutions haphazardly strung together to resemble interoperability

Time is Up

The call for interoperability started in 1996. With little advancement and not much hope on the horizon, we (your patients) are looking for other ways to get what we need. Next week, I’ll talk about my predictions for how interoperability will progress for the next generation.

# # #

Kristin Rowan, Editor
Kristin Rowan, Editor

Kristin Rowan has been working at The Rowan Report since 2008. She is the owner and Editor-in-chief of The Rowan Report, the industry’s most trusted source for care at home news, and speaker on Artificial Intelligence and Lone Worker Safety and state and national conferences.

She also runs Girard Marketing Group, a multi-faceted boutique marketing firm specializing in content creation, social media management, and event marketing.  Connect with Kristin directly kristin@girardmarketinggroup.com or www.girardmarketinggroup.com

©2025 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in The Rowan Report. One copy may be printed for personal use: further reproduction by permission only. editor@therowanreport.com

 

Interoperability

by Ben Rosen, Sr. Client Success Manager, Netsmart

Interoperability

What you need to know and how it affects you

For over two decades, tech companies and government agencies have been moving toward the goal of interoperability in healthcare technology. At long last, standards and protocols are in place — and continually being improved — to support open data exchange networks. As a result, healthcare providers, including human services, post-acute providers, and specialty practices, have more opportunities to participate in alternative payment models and adapt more readily to the evolving payment landscape.

Interoperability in Healthcare

What's driving the need for change?

Government regulatory agencies, together with payers and healthcare organizations, have long recognized the need to improve care coordination among healthcare providers. Making it easier to share information via a nationwide data sharing network is a critical component of this effort.

End Game

The ultimate goal of providing access to complete, accurate patient information is to help drive down costs to providers and electronic health record (EHR) users. Through exhaustive work and years of innovation, we’re seeing the tangible outcome of this effort. Information now flows seamlessly across multiple healthcare networks. Using a concise view of the data, we can focus on broader population health initiatives that improve outcomes for chronic conditions, reduce emergency department (ED) visits, and prevent hospitalizations. The interoperability market is moving ahead at blazing speeds. Therefore, we must understand the players who are the driving forces behind the movement.

Interoperability

The Interoperability Highway

Who are the players and how do they work together?

Healthcare technology is complex. It’s not surprising, then, that getting the disparate systems to share information seamlessly and securely is a complicated process. In the last decade an increasing number of vendors, organizations, and healthcare players started working together to advance a useful interoperability market.

Some of the larger players in this space include government and regulatory agencies. To understand the role these entities play and how they coordinate with other organizations and efforts, let’s compare the process to building a national highway system.

Building an open data exchange network

  • Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy and Office of the National Coordinator for Health (ASTP/ONC): This federal agency sets the vision, rules and regulations for health information technology policy. Compare it to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the federal agency that provides stewardship over the construction, maintenance, and preservation for all interstate highways.
  • Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA): Established by the ASTP/ONC, TEFCA sets the rules for health data exchange over the network. This is similar to plans or blueprints for highway construction. This would also include engineering, construction and safety standards for the highway.
  • The Sequoia Project (RCE): The Sequoia Project is the Recognized Co-ordinating Entity (RCE) for TEFCA and is appointed by the ASTP/ONC. The Sequoia Project is a non-profit, public-private collaborative that leads the implementation project for nationwide data exchange. They approve and help regulate the TEFCA exchange, via QHINs. The Sequoia Project can be compared to a construction manager that approves contractors and oversees quality control measures to ensure standards are met.
  • Qualified Health Information Networks (QHIN)s: QHINs are data sharing networks built to operate the exchange network as outlined by TEFCA. In our analogy, QHINs are the highways, and the companies that build QHINs can be compared to the construction companies that physically build and maintain the roadways themselves.

Now that you’re familiar with the entities involved in developing the standards for interoperability and building the data exchange networks that make it a reality, we will next look at how these enhanced capabilities can impact your organization.

This is part one of a four-part series covering the forces that are driving interoperability, as well as the future vision of open networks, and what it all could mean to your organization. Check back for part 2, “How TEFCA affects your technology and what the heck is a QHIN?” coming soon.

# # #

Interoperability Ben Rosen Netsmart
Interoperability Ben Rosen Netsmart

Ben Rosen is a senior client success manager and business unit owner for the interoperability solution suite at Netsmart. With more than a decade of healthcare experience, Ben has led numerous initiatives to integrate healthcare systems and enhance data sharing across the care continuum. His dedication to advancing healthcare interoperability drives his active involvement in industry initiatives and standards organizations, where he provides insight for frameworks such as HL7 FHIR, USCDI and others. Ben holds a Bachelor of Science in kinesiology from Kansas State University and a Bachelor of Science in nursing degree from the University of Nebraska Medical Center.

©2025 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in the Netsmart blog and is reprinted here with permission. For more information or to request permission to print, please contact Netsmart.

Updates on UnitedHealthcare CEO Shooting

by Kristin Rowan, Editor

Last Week

As most of the U.S. now knows, last week, UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was shot and killed outside a hotel in Manhattan just hours before the UnitedHealth Group Investor Event. The Rowan Report provided the breaking news story with the information available at the time.

Manhunt

According to reports, after the shooting, a man fled the scene on foot and then rode an e-bike toward Central Park. Police were in pursuit based on early descriptions of the shooter and later on video footage of the shooting. The suspect was wearing a hoodie in the images of the shooting. Further investigation found a photo of the suspect in the lobby of a hostel where it is believed he stayed, smiling. Police followed the suspect into Central Park, where it is believed he got into a taxi and left the park.

He was later spotted at a bus station near the George Washington bridge.

Conflicting Images

Images obtained of the suspect taken inside the hotel show a man appearing to be in his 20s, wearing a dark  jacket with the hood up and a black face mask resting under his chin. An image of the suspect at a nearby Starbucks puts the suspect in a dark jacket with a black mask covering his mouth. Twenty minutes after the shooting, he is spotted getting into a taxi wearing a black jacket and a white surgical mask covering his mouth and nose. Conspiracy theories about why he would change his mask started circulating quickly.

Ongoing Investigation

A video shows the suspect entering the bus station near the George Washington Bridge. There is no video of him exiting the station. Police believe he got on a bus.

Meanwhile, police found a backpack in Central Park they believe belonged to the suspect. The investigation also discovered a cell phone that may be linked to the shooting. Early on Monday, December 9, police returned to Central Park with dive crews to search for evidence.

Delay, Deny, Defend

Delay Deny Defend by Jay M. Feinman is a book criticizing health insurance companies. The sub-title, “Why Insurance Companies Don’t Pay Claims and What YOu can Do About It,” supports the description of the book indicating that Feinman explains how to be more custios when shopping for policies and what to do when you have a disputed claim. Feinman also includes a play for the legal reforms he feels are needed to end the abuse.

NYPD officers found writing on the three shell casings left at the scene of the shooting. Initially reported as “Deny, Defend, & Depose”, police have now clarified that the permanent marker found on the casings read “Deny, Delay, & Depose.”

Former FBI agent Brad Garrett said he believes the shooter is “trying to send a message.” Police have not commented on what they think the words might mean. Meanwhile, “Deny Defend Depose merchandise appeared overnight, followed quickly by the corrected “Deny Delay Depose.”

Person of Interest

Around the time the dive crews arrived to search for clues in Central Park, a man entered a McDonald’s in Altoona, PA, nearly 280 miles away. An employee recognized him as the man from the photos and alerted local police. The person of interest, now identified as Luigi Nicholas Mangione, had a weapon, a mask, and writings that linked him to the shooting. The writings suggest he has issues with corporate America in general, and named several other people in the document in addition to Brian Thompson. He also had a fake ID that matches the one used to check in to the hostel in New York. Mangione has now been charged with Thompson’s murder.

unitedhealthcare CEO Thompson Person of Interest

Mangione was taken into custody by local police. Several members of the NYPD were later seen entering the police station in Altoona. As of Monday afternoon, Mangione was refusing to talk to police and did not have an attorney.

A DNA swab was taken and will be compared with DNA from a Starbucks cup found near the scene. Reports indicate Mangione will be extradited to New York. Mangione was denied bail and will remain in the Pennsylvania prison while he and his attorney fight the extradition to New York.

Additional information about Mangione surfaced on December 11. Mangione’s grandfather founded Lorien Health Services. The company, based in Maryland, operates six ALFs and eight nursing homes. Mangione often volunteered with the company in high school. Additionally, Mangione’s former roommate said in an interview that Mangione recently had surgery that was “heinous” and left him with multiple screws in his body. 

Public Outcry

The customary sentiments of comfort, sympathy, and condolences were pointedly absent in the days after Thompson’s death. Instead, stories of denied claims, limitations on access to care, and other frustrations with the industry flooded social media. Of the 60,000 reactions to the UnitedHealth Group post about Thompson’s death, 57,000 were laugh emojis.

Many industry professionals noted that the incident has brought up bigger issues with healthcare insurance in general. The Rowan Report previously wrote about UnitedHealthcare using AI in place of medical professionals to determine medical necessity. This resulted in a much higher than expected denial rate and more than 90% reversal of denials on appeal.

For more information on how healthcare might change after the shooting death of Brian Thompson, please see our complimentary article this week, “Will Thompson’s death change healthcare?”

# # #

Kristin Rowan, Editor
Kristin Rowan, Editor

Kristin Rowan has been working at Healthcare at Home: The Rowan Report since 2008. She has a master’s degree in business administration and marketing and runs Girard Marketing Group, a multi-faceted boutique marketing firm specializing in event planning, sales, and marketing strategy. She has recently taken on the role of Editor of The Rowan Report and will add her voice to current Home Care topics as well as marketing tips for home care agencies. Connect with Kristin directly kristin@girardmarketinggroup.com or www.girardmarketinggroup.com

©2024 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in Healthcare at Home: The Rowan Report. One copy may be printed for personal use: further reproduction by permission only. editor@therowanreport.com

Healthcare is Heading Home

Web Golinkin, Forbes Books Author

Healthcare is Heading Home, and That's a Good Thing!

Healthcare is heading home

As the Baby Boomer generation ages, the home healthcare market is expanding. GETTY

During my long career in healthcare, one of the biggest trends in healthcare delivery has been the shift from hospital / inpatient to outpatient care. The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of outpatient services was roughly 8 percent from 2017 to 2022, while inpatient services grew 1-3 percent during the same period. Outpatient services now represent more than 50 percent of total U.S. healthcare spending.

Particularly during the past 20 years, there has been significant growth in new outpatient facilities and channels, including retail-based and urgent care clinics, freestanding ERs, imaging centers, dialysis centers, ambulatory surgery centers, rehabilitation clinics, behavioral health clinics, and telehealth / virtual care.

The shift towards outpatient care has been driven by multiple factors, including patient desire for convenience, the need to reduce costs, and rapid advances in medical science and technology. Now, however, a new trend in healthcare is pushing the boundaries of outpatient care increasingly into the home.

This article explores the rapid expansion of home healthcare, the factors driving its growth, and the important distinctions between home care, home health care, and hospital-at-home models.

Macro Growth Drivers

The U.S. home healthcare market has experienced exponential growth, projected to reach nearly $510 billion by 2027 (roughly equaling the projected size of the outpatient market), according to various industry reports. This represents a CAGR of approximately 8 percent from 2020 to 2027. Several factors contribute to this rapid expansion:

  1. Aging Population: One of the primary drivers of growth in home health care is the aging population. As the Baby Boomer generation reaches retirement age, there is a significant increase in the need for healthcare services tailored to older adults, many of whom prefer receiving care in the comfort of their homes.
  2. Rising Chronic Conditions: The prevalence of chronic diseases such as diabetes, heart disease, and respiratory illnesses is increasing. Home healthcare services, including skilled nursing and rehabilitation therapies, provide essential support for managing these conditions.
  3. Technological Advancements: Innovations in telehealth and remote monitoring technologies have transformed healthcare delivery. Patients can now receive real-time consultations and monitoring from healthcare professionals, reducing the need for in-person visits and enhancing the appeal of home healthcare .
  4. Cost-Effectiveness: Home healthcare is often more cost effective than traditional hospital care. By providing services at home, patients can avoid expensive hospital stays, and insurance providers are increasingly recognizing the value of home-based care, offering incentives for its use.
  5. Patient Preference: There is a growing preference among patients for receiving care in their own homes. This trend is driven by the desire for comfort, familiarity, and independence, as well as the recognition that home care can lead to better health outcomes.

Main Types of Service

Three basic types of home healthcare have emerged. It is important to understand the differences between them, as each type serves different needs and patient populations and requires different kinds of providers and support:

  1. Home Care: This term typically refers to non-medical assistance provided in a patient’s home. Services may include personal care (such as bathing and grooming), companionship, meal preparation, housekeeping, and transportation. Home Care is often used by individuals who need assistance with daily living activities but do not require regular medical intervention.
  2. Home Health Care: In contrast, Home Health Care involves medical services provided by licensed healthcare professionals. This may include skilled nursing, physical, occupational, and speech therapy, as well as home health aide services. Home Health Care is typically prescribed by a physician and is intended for patients recovering from illness, surgery, or managing chronic health conditions.
  3. Hospital-at-Home: This model represents a more recent innovation in home healthcare, allowing patients to receive acute-level care in their homes instead of in a hospital setting. Hospital-at-home programs provide comprehensive medical services, including monitoring and treatment for serious conditions, under the supervision of healthcare providers. This model aims to reduce hospital congestion, lower healthcare costs, and improve patient satisfaction by delivering hospital-level care in a familiar environment. In addition, there is growing evidence that it improves clinical outcomes and reduces hospital readmissions.

Future Growth Drivers

Several key drivers will underpin further growth of home healthcare:

    • Policy Changes and Regulations: Government policies have increasingly supported home health care. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and other government programs incentivize home-based care, reflecting a broader strategy to reduce healthcare costs and improve care quality.
    • Healthcare Provider Initiatives: Many providers are expanding their services to include home healthcare options as part of their overall care continuum. This integrated approach helps streamline patient transitions from hospital to home, improving coordination and outcomes.
    • Market Competition: The growing number of home health care agencies and providers has fostered competition, driving innovation and improvements in service delivery. This competition encourages providers to adopt new technologies and practices that enhance patient care.
    • Public Awareness and Education: Increasing awareness of home health care options has led to more patients and families opting for these services. Educational campaigns and outreach initiatives have helped to demystify home health care, making it a more accepted alternative to traditional care settings.

Obstacles to Growth

Despite its rapid growth, the home healthcare sector faces several challenges:

    • Workforce Shortages: The demand for qualified home health care professionals exceeds supply, leading to staffing shortages. This is exacerbated by the demanding nature of home health work and competitive wages offered by hospitals and other healthcare and non-healthcare settings.
    • Regulatory Hurdles: Navigating the regulatory landscape can be complex and burdensome for home healthcare providers. Compliance with Medicare and Medicaid requirements, as well as with state regulations, often demands significant administrative resources. This can restrict the ability of smaller agencies to scale and compete effectively.
    • Insurance Reimbursement Issues: While insurance providers increasingly cover home health services, reimbursement policies can be inconsistent. Challenges related to payment models, including delays and denials, may hinder access to necessary care for patients and impact the financial viability of home health agencies.
    • Technology Adoption: Although technology is a key growth driver, some providers and patients resist adopting new tools. Ensuring that healthcare professionals are adequately trained in using telehealth platforms and remote monitoring devices is critical for successful implementation.

Positive Future Outlook

The outlook for home health care remains positive, as the sector adapts to evolving consumer needs and preferences. Several trends are expected to shape its future:

  1. Integration of Technology: The continued integration of telehealth and artificial intelligence (AI) into home healthcare will enhance service delivery and patient monitoring. Wearable devices and remote patient monitoring systems will likely become standard tools for managing chronic conditions at home.
  2. Focus on Value-Based Care: As healthcare systems shift toward value-based care models, home healthcare will play a pivotal role in managing patient outcomes and costs. Providers will increasingly be held accountable for the quality of care delivered at home, leading to a greater emphasis on patient engagement and satisfaction.
  3. Expanding Service Lines: Home healthcare providers and agencies will likely expand their service offerings to include mental health support, palliative care, and specialized rehabilitation services. This diversification will cater to the broader needs of patients, particularly those with complex medical conditions.
  4. Enhanced Collaboration: There will be a growing emphasis on interdisciplinary collaboration among healthcare providers, including hospitals, primary care providers, and home health agencies. This collaboration will facilitate smoother transitions of care and improve overall patient outcomes.
  5. Increased Investment: As the demand for home health services continues to escalate, investment in the sector is expected to grow. Venture capital and private equity firms are increasingly recognizing the potential of home healthcare, leading to innovations and improvements in service delivery.

The growth of home healthcare is a testament to the changing landscape of healthcare delivery. Driven by demographic shifts, technological advancements, and evolving consumer preferences, this sector is poised for continued expansion.

As challenges such as workforce shortages and regulatory hurdles persist, the future of home health care will depend on the ability of providers to innovate and adapt.

Nevertheless, healthcare is moving inexorably towards the home. That is good news for millions of patients who need acute, transitional or long-term care in the most comfortable environment, and for providers and third-party payers who are seeking to maximize the value of care being delivered.

# # #

Marcylle Combs Care at Home Worker Safety
Web Golinkin
Web Golinkin has focused his career on making health information and care more accessible and affordable. He has done this as CEO of five companies over the past 35 years, including three he co-founded.

These companies include the largest cable TV network devoted to health (America’s Health Network), one of the nation’s largest operators of retail-based clinics (RediClinic), a leading population health management company (Health Dialog), and one of the nation’s largest operators of urgent care clinics (FastMed). Web also co- founded the Convenient Care Association and served as its Chair for many years. He has been widely covered in the national media and has spoken at numerous healthcare conferences.

A magna cum laude graduate of Harvard, Web grew up in New York City and Long Island but has lived in Houston since 1988, so he is almost a Texan. A longtime runner and fitness enthusiast, Web enjoys tennis and golf—as long as he can walk and carry his bag. Web has been married to the same extraordinary woman for 39 years, and they have two amazing sons who make him proud every day.

©2024 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in Forbes Author Posts. For more information or to request permission to use, please contact Forbes.

Teaching Caregivers How to Help Patients Heal

by Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.

Noora Health has developed a program of “health companions” in a variety of types of healthcare settings (“Teaching Patients How to Heal,” The New York Times, April 14, 2024) to help patient heal. The basis of these programs is that when medical information is properly communicated to patients and their families, complications of surgeries and illnesses are reduced. An added bonus is that acts of violence by frustrated family members against health care workers are reduced.

If patients are most comforted by their loved ones, why not involve them in the healthcare process? “We realized that caregivers get little to no guidance within the health care system,” said Shahed Alam, a co-founder of Noora Health. Many patients do not know why they are receiving care. Doctors and nurses tend repeat the same information to patient after patient.

In institutional settings, staff nurses literally take over the floors to teach patients and their family members. On cardiac floors, for example, staff nurses tell patients how to cough without stressing their hearts, how to scratch without adversely affecting their wounds, and how pacemakers work. Staff nurses also help patients sift through good and bad information. Classes frequently include how to manage side effects of medications and the importance of handwashing.

Many patients and their family members come to view the staff nurses as therapists, coaches, friends and philosophers all rolled into one. A family member who received help from a health companion described the companion as a “friend” without whom she would not have been able to care for her family member.

Although home care providers, including Medicare certified home health agencies, hospices, private duty home care agencies, and durable medical equipment (DME) companies do not necessarily have a “captive audience” like institutional providers, it is still possible to utilize health companions. Field staff can be trained to provide teaching that is similar to that provided by health companions. Teaching from health companions may also be provided to home care patients and their family members in group settings. Hospices may, for example, provide volunteers to be with patients while their caregivers attend. And, of course, virtual teachings with health companions may also prove valuable.

Providers often consider ways to differentiate their services in a competitive marketplace. Perhaps the use of health companions is one way to do so, Providers may also enhance loyalty from patients and their families, improve quality of care and prevent emergency room visits, hospitalizations and rehospitalizations. Think about it!

©2024 Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq. All rights reserved.
No portion of this material may be reproduced in any form without the advance written permission of the author.
©2024 This article appeared in The Rowan Report. All rights reserved.