Paul Joiner: On the Record

by Kristin Rowan | Jul 24, 2025 | Admin, Artificial Intelligence, Home Health, Hospice

by Kristin Rowan, Editor

Paul Joiner

On the Record

Paul Joiner, CEO of HHAeXchange, sat down with The Rowan Report Editor Kristin Rowan to discuss the company’s new headquarters in Manhattan, the company culture he’s creating, his dedication to support those helping our most vulnerable populations.

In His Own Words

The Rowan Report: Paul, thank you for taking the time to talk to us. HHAeXchange is going through some significant growth recently. And now you’ve moved your headquarters from Long Island to Manhattan, correct? How did that decision come about?

Paul Joiner: HHAeXchange has been in Manhattan for a long time. Sandata, who we acquired earlier this year, was in Long Island. But, the move was planned with or without Sandata. We needed a nice sized space to convene people. We valued a large, multi-purpose meeting space over individual office space. It’s a space where the teams can meet when they come to town, where we can host clients, and larger company meetings.

RR: How does the new space support your team?

Paul: The majority of our team is remote. I don’t think remote work is healthy for everyone. It varies from person to person. It’s not a long-term healthy option. Returning back to the office 9-5 five days a week isn’t practical and not all that healthy either. We have created policies, a workspace, and a culture where people are invited to visit. Some come 2-3 days per week. Some only once a month. We maintain flexibility for our teams to work when and where they need to work. Being a single parent, for example, is really hard, so we stay flexible to support single parents to be where they need to be.

At the same time, we’ve seen the benefit of the connection and how much more healthy it is by physically coming together. For the younger workforce, they are enjoying getting together and coming into the office. We have to support our younger employees and their professional development. How do you professionally develop via Zoom or Teams? Physically coworking and promoting good and active environments compel people to come into the office. To build connections, you have to be together, not just on video.

RR: You have workers across the country, though. How does that work?

Paul: We have the main office here in Manhattan, a large and growing office in Minneapolis, and a smaller office in Miami. We try to keep people in areas that make it easy to meet. However, we do have some roles with certain criteria that allows for mostly remote work. Those teams come to one of the offices to meet when they can. We’ve hosted team meetings here and in Minneapolis recently.

RR: Has this new meeting space had an impact on the company culture?

Paul: Yeah, it has improved. We are having real, honest conversations about what needs to be improved. The team effort is the way we win and our teams understand that. We also understand that working hard doesn’t mean foregoing your life and the ability to recharge.

Work hard, be passionate, and motivate people with your mission and vision. The people we serve don’t have it easy, they are supporting the most vulnerable people.

RR: In a recent statement, you said that the new location will support collaboration and innovation. Do you have new features on the horizon? Are you investing in AI capabilities?

Paul: We have a lot in the works. We have a new mobile app in the beta phase that we’ll be rolling out that I’m really excited about. It’s actually an update, but it’s so massive that it’s basically new. We’re working on data analytics and data tracking for some of our largest clients. We’ve consolidated some screens into one spot to streamline and make the user more efficient. A lot of what we’re working on is foundational. We’re focusing on supporting companies as they scale.

RR: Are you looking into AI, either within the HHAeXchange platform, or in a partner?

Paul: Yeah, of course. AI is the future and it’s everywhere. We are looking at ways to return time to users, make it easier to train users, and make things easier on caregivers. We will try to generate more buzz around AI, but not until there’s real, tangible value. AI definitely needs to be part of our strategy, but being smart where we apply it to truly get the value-add for our clients. It has to improve the quality of life for the user. Does it improve the ability of caregivers to care for people?

RR: Do you have any additional acquisition or growth plans for the second half of 2025?

Paul: There’s a lot going on in the marketplace right now. A lot of our clients are growing really well also. So, we’re sort of in a heads-down mode. There’s a handful of things we’re looking at. Right now, I’m really excited about being a bigger participant across the full continuum of care for our populations. There are some opportunities to innovate and evolve to support integrated care over the next few years. I’ll just leave it at that…for now.

RR: Paul, thank you for joining me today. It’s always a pleasure.

# # #

About HHAeXchange

Founded in 2008, HHAeXchange is the leading technology platform for homecare and self-direction program management. Developed specifically for Medicaid home and community-based services (HCBS), HHAeXchange connects state agencies, managed care organizations, providers, and caregivers through its intuitive web-based platform, enabling unparalleled communication, transparency, efficiency, and compliance. In 2024, HHAeXchange expanded through the strategic acquisitions of Sandata, Cashé Software, and Generations Homecare System, strengthening its commitment to advancing the industry.

About Paul Joiner

Paul Joiner is an accomplished executive with extensive leadership experience in the healthcare sector. Currently serving as a Board Member at AssistRx, Joiner has held prominent positions, including Chief Executive Officer at both HHAeXchange and Kipu Health. Previous roles include Chief Operating Officer as well as Executive Vice President and General Manager at Availity, and Senior Vice President and General Manager of Health Plan. Joiner also served as Vice President of Client Engagement and Business Development at Midas+ Solutions, Xerox Healthcare Provider Solutions. Educational qualifications include a Master of Accountancy from Belmont University and a Bachelor of Accountancy from the University of Mississippi.

Kristin Rowan has been working at The Rowan Report since 2008. She is the owner and Editor-in-chief of The Rowan Report, the industry’s most trusted source for care at home news, and speaker on Artificial Intelligence and Lone Worker Safety and state and national conferences.

She also runs Girard Marketing Group, a multi-faceted boutique marketing firm specializing in content creation, social media management, and event marketing. Connect with Kristin directly kristin@girardmarketinggroup.com or www.girardmarketinggroup.com

©2025 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in The Rowan Report. One copy may be printed for personal use: further reproduction by permission only. editor@therowanreport.com

Impact of H.R. 1: The Homebound and Overlooked

by Tim Rowan | Jul 24, 2025 | Medicaid, Regulatory

Analysis by Tim Rowan, Editor Emeritus

The Impact of H.R. 1

Homebound and Overlooked

In early 2025, the Republican-led Congress introduced its proposed budget for FY2026 and beyond, a sweeping legislative effort aimed at curbing federal expenditures and restructuring entitlement programs. Medicaid, one of the largest healthcare safety nets in the United States, faces major revisions under this bill. Central to the proposed changes is the shift toward block grants or per-capita caps on federal funding. The legislation also rolls back incentives enacted into law by the Affordable Care act, including those that supported Medicaid expansion. The reconciliation bill, signed into law on July 4, also eliminates financial support for optional services such as home and community-based services (HCBS). A new set of work requirements in the new law will expand the paperwork burden for beneficiaries.

Risks for Home- and Community-Based Care

The figure below presents a visual from the Commonwealth Fund showing their projection of over $100 billion in cumulative federal Medicaid cuts by 2035. These reductions are expected to disproportionately affect non-mandated programs like HCBS, which are many times more economical than residential care. With diminished federal support, states will face pressure to reallocate limited resources, often at the expense of these optional, yet critical, programs. ¹

For nearly eight million elderly Americans, Medicaid-funded HCBS has helped reduce hospital admissions, extend independence, and relieve stress on long-term care facilities. However, the new budget cuts destabilize these programs. Barbara Merrill, CEO of ANCOR, expressed concern, stating, “When you cut federal Medicaid dollars, even for optional services, states have to make tough decisions about who gets care and when.”² Experts anticipate that approval delays, extended waitlists, and even termination of services could follow as states struggle to maintain existing infrastructure.

Comparing the 2005 Budget Bill to the Affordable Care Act

Compared to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the Republican budget bill marks a significant policy reversal. The ACA expanded Medicaid eligibility and incentivized states to develop non-institutional care models. It emphasized preventive care and home-based treatment options, helping shift care away from costly institutional settings. By contrast, the new bill eliminates such incentives and introduces fiscal and operational barriers. According to data from Medicaid.gov and the Kaiser Family Foundation, Medicaid enrollment, which rose steadily during the ACA years, is projected to drop by 10% nationwide once the budget bill is implemented³. This decline reflects both tightening eligibility and retreat from HCBS programs.

Healthcare providers will need to brace for substantial ripple effects. With fewer patients accessing home care, hospitals and emergency departments may see an uptick in acute episodes related to unmanaged chronic conditions. Providers may also encounter staffing shortages and reduced reimbursements, undermining service quality and sustainability. Richard Edwards, policy director at Amivie Home Health, warned, “If states cut home care services, many patients have no other choice but to enter a skilled nursing facility. That’s not just a shift in care—it’s often a worse outcome at a higher cost.” ⁴ These operational challenges could exacerbate pressure on an already strained healthcare workforce.

Scope and Severity of Coming Changes

Today, over eight million seniors rely on Medicaid-funded HCBS, with an average annual cost per recipient of $29,000. Thirty-three states use HCBS waivers to administer these services, yet the average state waitlist already exceeds 3,000 applicants. Institutional care costs remain 57% higher than home care, making HCBS not only more humane but more fiscally prudent. Despite that, projected federal cuts of $100 billion by 2035 threaten to replace HCBS with nursing home care. Meanwhile, a national enrollment drop of 10% would leave millions at risk of losing coverage and care.

Richard Edwards, policy director at Amivie Home Health, explains, “If states cut home care services, many patients have no other choice but to enter a skilled nursing facility. That’s not just a shift in care—it’s often a worse healthcare and social outcome at a higher cost.” ⁴

8 million elderly rely on Medicaid HCBS
$29,000/year average cost per Medicaid home care recipient
33 states use HCBS waivers
Average state waitlist for HCBS exceeds 3,000 applicants
Institutional care costs 57% more than home care
Estimated federal Medicaid cuts by 2035: $100 billion
Projected national enrollment drop: 10%

Implications for Care at Home: Next Steps

To mitigate these risks, policy experts are advocating for pragmatic alternatives, knowing that implementation depends entirely on the direction in which political winds blow. Federal stabilization grants could offer targeted relief to states with high HCBS enrollment, preserving continuity of care. Streamlining waiver approvals would reduce bureaucratic delays and ease access for both providers and patients. Retaining key ACA incentives could help maintain momentum in home-based care innovation. States would also benefit from flexible financing rules, including reformed provider tax policies, to better manage Medicaid funds under new constraints.

Final Thoughts

Ultimately, the new budget, passed with no Democratic votes, may reshape eldercare delivery for years to come. With states facing hard choices, the healthcare community must prepare for transitions that could disrupt care and deepen inequities. Advocacy for vulnerable populations, investment in alternatives, and ongoing engagement in policy reform will be essential to ensure seniors receive the care they deserve in the setting they prefer.

# # #

____________________________________________

¹ Congressional Budget Office, Federal Healthcare Outlook 2025–2035
² Barbara Merrill, ANCOR Policy Brief, March 2025
³ Kaiser Family Foundation, Medicaid Enrollment Tracker, April 2025
⁴ Amivie Health, Testimony to House Budget Committee, June 2025

Tim Rowan is a 30-year home care technology consultant who co-founded and served as Editor and principal writer of this publication for 25 years. He continues to occasionally contribute news and analysis articles under The Rowan Report’s new ownership. He also continues to work part-time as a Home Care recruiting and retention consultant. More information: RowanResources.com
Tim@RowanResources.com

Monthly Stipends Not Allowed

by Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq. | Jun 20, 2025 | Admin, Legal

by Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.

Medical Directors:

Monthly Stipends Not Allowed

Monthly stipends to Medical Directors for referrals of patients could cost you. Earlier this month, a hospice provider in Georgia settled claims of violation of the federal Anti-Kickback statute (AKS) and the federal False Claims Act (FCA) by agreeing to pay $9.2 million. The allegations include payments of kickbacks, including monthly stipends, to Medical Directors in exchange for referrals of patients. These practices resulted in three whistleblower lawsuits against the hospice by former employees. They will receive $1.5 million.

Marketing, not Monthly Stipends

In the meanwhile, marketing strategies utilized by post-acute providers are generating fierce competition for referrals, especially Medicare beneficiaries who need home health services! As a result, providers are appropriately committing more and more resources to marketing activities. Providers are, for example, entering into agreements with referring physicians to provide consulting services to their organizations. These legitimate relationships may easily be misunderstood by enforcers.

Consulting Physicians

First, it is important to acknowledge that providers of services in patients’ residences need consulting physicians’ services. Examples of services that are genuinely needed, from a business perspective, may include the following:

Consultation regarding clinically complex cases
Assistance with the development and maintenance of specialty programs
Communication with physicians who provide inappropriate orders for care, do not return signed orders on time, or are unresponsive to staff members who are seeking modifications to treatment plans

As providers know, however, these types of arrangements raise important legal issues related to potential violations of the AKS, the federal so-called Stark laws, the FCA, and state statutes that are probably similar to these federal statutes.

Avoid Trouble with Specific Contracts

Providers are likely to avoid violations if they meet the requirements of the personal services “safe harbor” under the AKS and the contractual exception under the Stark laws. The safe harbor and exception generally require providers to pay consulting physicians who also make referrals to them based upon written agreements that require payments at fair market value for services actually rendered without regard to the volume or value of referrals received.

Practically, Providers Should:

Pay physicians who also make referrals
- on an hourly basis
- not a set monthly amount of stipends
Develop standardized agreements and use them consistently with all referring physicians who receive consulting fees
- Providers cannot afford to use a variety of different agreements that may not meet applicable requirements
- Staff must understand that they can use only the standard approved agreement and cannot modify it without advance written approval from a designated, knowledgeable individual
Document services rendered and the amount of time spent on these activities.
- Documentation is crucial
- Providers should develop and implement policies and procedures that permit payments to physicians only after appropriate documentation to support payments has been received and reviewed
Avoid agreements for consulting services with physicians whose services they do not actually use
- even if they make no payments to them
- terminate these agreements if they do not need the services covered by them or it may appear that the only purpose for the agreements is to induce referrals as opposed to a documented need for services
Avoid having numerous consulting physicians/medical directors
- Although there are usually no limits on the number of consulting physicians/medical directors that providers can have at any given time, a very large number is likely to invite scrutiny by regulators and should be avoided
- How many is too many? The number should certainly bear some relationship to the size of the provider organization and the geographic area served.
- Beyond this general guideline, common sense must prevail. The bottom line is: does the provider have legitimate work for every consulting physician?
Avoid asking consulting physicians to perform commercially reasonable services that are related to the volume and value of referrals made
- Providers cannot, for example, ask referring physicians to assist with quality assurance activities that
  - Entail their review of charts of patients whom they referred to the provider
  - Ensure the more referrals made, the more money consulting physicians make

Final Thoughts

Providers are more likely to avoid enforcement activities when they follow these practical guidelines. Violations hurt providers and referral sources alike. In view of the possible adverse consequences, expenditures of financial and other resources are certainly justified to get it right.

# # #

Elizabeth Hogue is an attorney in private practice with extensive experience in health care. She represents clients across the U.S., including professional associations, managed care providers, hospitals, long-term care facilities, home health agencies, durable medical equipment companies, and hospices.

No portion of this material may be reproduced in any form without the advance written permission of the author.

Workplace Violence in Home Health

by Kristin Rowan | Jun 20, 2025 | Caregiver Safety, Caring for the Caregiver, Clinical, Home Health, Hospice

by Kristin Rowan, Editor

Workplace Violence and Policy Impact

Study of home health workers

A group of researchers from the University of Cincinnati, Ohio published a recent study¹ on the frequency and reporting procedures of workplace violence (WPV) in home healthcare. The study specifically addressed WPV in home healthcare, stating limited understanding of WPV in the home care setting. Most existing studies on WPV were hospital-based.

Frequency of Workplace Violence

Of the home health care workers (HHCW) surveyed, almost 37% responded that they experience both verbal and emotional violence in the workplace daily. More than 80% reported experiencing verbal aggression at some point. Physical violence is less prominent. 20% of respondants said they experience physical violence monthly. However, 56.6% said they have experienced physical violence at some point in their current agency. 76.6% of the time, the perpetrators of the violence are the patients of the HHCW.

Fig. 1 Frequency of occurrence of physical, verbal, emotional, and sexual abuse as a function of time: daily, weekly, monthly, <yearly, yearly, and never.

Reporting Workplace Violence

All of the study participants indicated they had knowledge of workplace violence reporting procedures in their agencies, but 26.7% were unsure if the policies are contained in the employee handbook. 46.7% were uncertain as to whether the agency offered WPV or de-escalation training and 66% said prevention and de-escalation training was not mandatory. Unfortunately, 40% said their management did not encourage reporting and 33% said they were not comfortable approaching management about WPV. Despite the frequency of WPV among the respondents, none of the participants reported these incidents to management.

Thoughts

According to this, and other research studies on workplace violence in home healthcare, the problem is prevalent and persistent. Most HHCWs have experienced some sort of aggression, violence, or abuse in the course of performing their jobs. Of those who have, most do not report the incidents to management. Most HHCWs have not been trained in prevention or de-escalation. Even with training, HHCWs need a way to get immediate help. Unfortunately, most do not have an emergency alert system on their person during home visits.

Solution

Care at Home agencies, including non-medical supportive care, home health, hospice, and any other lone workers who are visiting patients in their homes, need safety policies and procedures. Agencies must include the same in the employee handbook, explain during orientation, and make available to HHCWs digitally.

Policies and procedures should include:

A safety committee comprised of management, back office staff, and field workers
A clearly written policy regarding physical, emotional, verbal, and sexual abuse
- Against a patient or their family/friends by a HHCW
- Against a HHCW by a patient or their family/friends
- Against a HHCW by a colleague or manager
- Against a HHCW by the environment in which they work (i.e. aggressive pets, weapons, cigarette smoking indoors, etc.)
A digital reporting system that employees can use without having to approach management individually
A clearly written policy on the management response to violence reporting
A clearly written policy forbidding any retaliation or discrimination against a reporting employee
Required research about new patients including
- Background/History of violence and/or mental instability
- Neighborhood safety rating
- Family members likely to be in the home and their history of violence and/or mental instability

Additional Tools for HHCWs

Workplace violence against HHCWs is not “if,” but “when.” It is the responsibility of the agencies to lower the risk, lower the percentage of “whens,” and encourage reporting. If you’re not sure how to begin, hire a consultant to help you build your safety committee and write your policies. It doesn’t matter how you start implementing safety protocols, as long as you follow through and protect your employees.

# # #

1. Obariase, E.; Bellacov, R.; Gillespie, G.; Davis, K. (2025). Assessing Workplace Violence and Policy Impact: A Cross-sectional Study of Home Healthcare Workers. Home Healthcare Now, 43(3), 150-156. doi: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000001345

AI in Home Care

by Rowan Report | Jun 13, 2025 | Artificial Intelligence, Home Health, Hospice

by Laurie Orlov, Founder, Aging and Health Technology Watch

The Future of AI in Home Care

New Research Report

Wed, 06/04/2025

PORT SAINT LUCIE, FL, UNITED STATES, June 4, 2025 /EINPresswire.com/ — The home care industry is facing a crisis. Driven by demographic shifts, longer life expectancy, and rising rates of chronic illness and cognitive decline, the demand for in-home personal care and home health care is surging. This will accelerate as the baby boomers age into their later years – in January, the oldest of the 76 million baby boomers will turn 80. At the same time, the care industries will face a critical shortage of all categories of care delivery, with millions of additional workers needed over the next decade. Against this backdrop, AI technology has emerged to help older adults in multiple ways. In a 2023 report, The Future of AI and Older Adults, AI was already able to produce insights about a person’s health needs and offer a chatbot to help with post-hospital care. In a subsequent 2023 report, AI and the Future of Care Work, it was apparent that AI could help generate an appropriate care plan and that an ‘AI Caregiver’ role was emerging to supplement in-person care delivery. In the 2024 report, The Future of AI in Senior Living and Care, AI was being used to analyze hospital discharge information to compare patient needs to nursing home capacity.

Today there are many more initiatives and new possibilities for addressing multiple aspects of both private duty home care and home health operations, including assistance with recruiting and onboarding workers, using data to create and update care-related documents, and introducing AI agents that can be assigned to complete specific tasks. As current industry leaders note, AI tech is playing a role in care oversight and enabling the creating of hybrid models – an increasingly likely combination of in-person care supplemented with AI.

This report draws insights from experts across home care, home health care, plus software and device providers, and healthcare sectors to examine how AI is currently being used and suggest what lies ahead within the next five years.

The report can be found at this link: https://www.ageinplacetech.com/page/future-ai-home-care

# # #

Laurie Orlov The Future of AI in Home Care

Laurie M. Orlov, a tech industry veteran, writer, speaker, elder care advocate, is the founder of Aging and Health Technology Watch — market research, trends, blogs and reports that provide thought leadership, analysis and guidance about health and aging-related technologies and services that enable boomers and seniors to sustain and improve their quality of life. In her previous career, Laurie spent many years in the technology industry, including 9 years at analyst firm Forrester Research. She has spoken regularly and delivered keynote speeches at forums, industry consortia, conferences, and symposia, most recently on the business of technology for boomers and seniors. She advises large organizations as well as non-profits and entrepreneurs about trends and opportunities in the age-related technology market. Her perspectives have been quoted in the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, Vox, Senior Housing News, CNN Health, AARP Bulletin and Consumer Reports. She has a graduate certification in Geriatric Care Management from the University of Florida and a BA in Music from the University of Rochester. Laurie has provided testimony about technology at a Senate Aging Committee hearing and has consulted to AARP. Advisory clients have included AARP, AOL, Argentum, Bose, Calix, CDW, Microsoft, Novartis, and Philips. Her reports include: The Market Overview Technology for Aging 2025, The Future of AI in Senior Living and Care, The User Experience Needs An Upgrade 2024, The Future of AI and Older and Older Adults 2023, The Future of Care Work and Older Adults 2023, The Future of Sensors and Older Adults 2022, Beyond DIY: The Future of Smart Homes and Older Adults 2021, and The Future of Wearables and Older Adults 2021. Laurie has been named one of the Women Leaders in Voice, Top 50 Influencers in Aging by Next Avenue and one of the Women leading global innovation on AgeTech.

©2025 by Aging and Health Technology Watch. All rights reserved. This introduction and link are printed with permission from the author. For more information or to request usage rights, please contact Laurie Orlov.

Interoperability

by Rowan Report | May 16, 2025 | Clinical, Interoperability, Regulatory

by Ben Rosen, Sr. Client Success Manager, Netsmart

Interoperability

What you need to know and how it affects you

For over two decades, tech companies and government agencies have been moving toward the goal of interoperability in healthcare technology. At long last, standards and protocols are in place — and continually being improved — to support open data exchange networks. As a result, healthcare providers, including human services, post-acute providers, and specialty practices, have more opportunities to participate in alternative payment models and adapt more readily to the evolving payment landscape.

Interoperability in Healthcare

What's driving the need for change?

Government regulatory agencies, together with payers and healthcare organizations, have long recognized the need to improve care coordination among healthcare providers. Making it easier to share information via a nationwide data sharing network is a critical component of this effort.

End Game

The ultimate goal of providing access to complete, accurate patient information is to help drive down costs to providers and electronic health record (EHR) users. Through exhaustive work and years of innovation, we’re seeing the tangible outcome of this effort. Information now flows seamlessly across multiple healthcare networks. Using a concise view of the data, we can focus on broader population health initiatives that improve outcomes for chronic conditions, reduce emergency department (ED) visits, and prevent hospitalizations. The interoperability market is moving ahead at blazing speeds. Therefore, we must understand the players who are the driving forces behind the movement.

The Interoperability Highway

Who are the players and how do they work together?

Healthcare technology is complex. It’s not surprising, then, that getting the disparate systems to share information seamlessly and securely is a complicated process. In the last decade an increasing number of vendors, organizations, and healthcare players started working together to advance a useful interoperability market.

Some of the larger players in this space include government and regulatory agencies. To understand the role these entities play and how they coordinate with other organizations and efforts, let’s compare the process to building a national highway system.

Building an open data exchange network

Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy and Office of the National Coordinator for Health (ASTP/ONC): This federal agency sets the vision, rules and regulations for health information technology policy. Compare it to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the federal agency that provides stewardship over the construction, maintenance, and preservation for all interstate highways.
Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA): Established by the ASTP/ONC, TEFCA sets the rules for health data exchange over the network. This is similar to plans or blueprints for highway construction. This would also include engineering, construction and safety standards for the highway.
The Sequoia Project (RCE): The Sequoia Project is the Recognized Co-ordinating Entity (RCE) for TEFCA and is appointed by the ASTP/ONC. The Sequoia Project is a non-profit, public-private collaborative that leads the implementation project for nationwide data exchange. They approve and help regulate the TEFCA exchange, via QHINs. The Sequoia Project can be compared to a construction manager that approves contractors and oversees quality control measures to ensure standards are met.
Qualified Health Information Networks (QHIN)s: QHINs are data sharing networks built to operate the exchange network as outlined by TEFCA. In our analogy, QHINs are the highways, and the companies that build QHINs can be compared to the construction companies that physically build and maintain the roadways themselves.

Now that you’re familiar with the entities involved in developing the standards for interoperability and building the data exchange networks that make it a reality, we will next look at how these enhanced capabilities can impact your organization.

This is part one of a four-part series covering the forces that are driving interoperability, as well as the future vision of open networks, and what it all could mean to your organization. Check back for part 2, “How TEFCA affects your technology and what the heck is a QHIN?” coming soon.

# # #

Ben Rosen is a senior client success manager and business unit owner for the interoperability solution suite at Netsmart. With more than a decade of healthcare experience, Ben has led numerous initiatives to integrate healthcare systems and enhance data sharing across the care continuum. His dedication to advancing healthcare interoperability drives his active involvement in industry initiatives and standards organizations, where he provides insight for frameworks such as HL7 FHIR, USCDI and others. Ben holds a Bachelor of Science in kinesiology from Kansas State University and a Bachelor of Science in nursing degree from the University of Nebraska Medical Center.

©2025 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in the Netsmart blog and is reprinted here with permission. For more information or to request permission to print, please contact Netsmart.

Meaningful AI

by Rowan Report | Apr 24, 2025 | Admin, Artificial Intelligence, Caring for the Caregiver

by Scott Green, Care Dimensions at Netsmart

Meaningful AI in Post-Acute

Elevating Care and Efficiency with Integrated AI

Meaningful AI is more than plugging your questions into ChatGPT. It goes beyond Artificial Intelligence into Augmented Intelligence.

After a long day of caring for patients, a home health nurse pulls into their driveway, bracing for the familiar evening grind — hours of documentation. They take a deep breath, one of relief. They’re not mentally preparing for hours at their laptop, documenting every visit, trying to recall every detail while fatigue tugs at their focus. Tonight is different.

Tonight, they step through the door, greeted by their kids clamoring to show off their school projects. Dinner is already on the table, and for the first time in weeks, they sit with their family—truly present. There’s no need to pull out the laptop after dessert, no late-night race against deadlines. Their documentation? Done. Completed during patient visits, thanks to an integrated AI workflow that not only captured essential details of their patient but also highlighted critical care needs in near real-time.

This isn’t just a glimpse of what’s possible—it’s the reality Meaningful Augmented Intelligence (AI) creates for home care & hospice providers. With AI-assisted documentation tools, caregivers are freed from after-hours work. Repetitive tasks are automated, and accurate, compliant records are captured during visits. As a result, clinicians can focus on what matters most: delivering care to their patients during the day and being present for their families at night.

Meaningful Integrated AI in Care at Home: How it Works and Why It Matters

Integrated AI doesn’t just automate tasks—it enhances every part of the care process. By embedding AI directly into existing workflows, solutions empower clinicians and administrators to work smarter, not harder. Predictive analytics, real-time documentation and automated data entry reduce repetitive tasks and administrative burden, clearing staff to focus on patient care.

Unlike generic AI tools, Meaningful AI supports clinicians at the point of care. It captures essential details during visits, highlights critical needs as they arise, and offers real-time guidance. This isn’t just about making work faster—it’s about making it more human. Integrated AI simplifies workflows and strengthens decision-making, whether it’s anticipating a patient’s end-of-life needs, identifying compliance risks, or supporting proactive billing.

The AI Trifecta

AI isn’t just about automation—it’s about Meaningful AI that directly addresses the needs of community-based providers. With our AI Trifecta, every aspect of care delivery is reimagined to optimize processes, empower staff, and simplify reimbursement.

Optimize Processes

Integrated AI helps organizations operate more efficiently by taking over time-intensive, repetitive tasks, allowing staff to focus on patient care. For example, guided assist tools integrated with clinical workflows proactively coach staff through complex tasks like completing the OASIS assessment or interdisciplinary start of care documentation.

Imagine a clinician documenting care after a patient visit. With AI-powered assistance, charting can pre-fill fields based on visit details, flag potential inconsistencies in near real-time and suggest changes to align with regulatory requirements for a supervisor to review. This reduces errors and speeds up documentation, freeing clinicians to focus on patients rather than administrative tasks.

Predictive analytics empower organizations to anticipate and address challenges early, supporting clinical benefits of Hospice Visits in the Last Days of Life (HVLDL) such as symptom management, reduced patient distress and honoring the patient’s end-of-life wishes.

Empower Staff

The backbone of any agency is its staff. Integrated AI tools relieve the pressures of excessive documentation and administrative burdens. These tools aren’t just about doing tasks faster—they help create a more sustainable work-life balance by addressing challenges like burnout and turnover.

Staff can also benefit from smart task prioritization. Meaningful AI tools can include the ability to log in and instantly see a clear list of priorities based on patient needs and compliance deadlines. This reduces time spent figuring out “what’s next” so that every action directly contributes to better patient outcomes.

Simplify Reimbursement

Some AI tools monitor claims for potential issues before submission. Imagine if your system could identify a missing modifier or mismatch in coding then flag the problem and provide actionable suggestions to correct it. This not only increases first-pass acceptance rates but also reduces the exhausting back-and-forth that often accompanies denied claims.

Beyond preventing errors, predictive tools assess patterns in denial risks and reimbursement trends, enabling organizations to adjust strategies proactively. Leaders can use these insights to negotiate better contracts or refine documentation practices, ensuring steady cash flow and financial health and upstream process improvement. This empowers organizations to invest resources where they matter most: improving patient outcomes.

About Netsmart myUnity® NX

With Meaningful AI at the heart of myUnity NX, every part of the healthcare process—from care delivery to financial health—works smarter, not harder. These innovations support not just operational efficiency but also the well-being of care teams. By embedding intelligent workflows, providers have the time and space to focus on what matters most—delivering exceptional, person-centered care. Learn more about Netsmart myUnity® NX

# # #

Scott Green leads the Care Dimensions business unit at Netsmart. In his role, he leads a team focused on building out a comprehensive suite of solutions designed to support organizations as they digitize their operations beyond the EHR. Green has been with Netsmart for 10 years and has held many roles during that time including leading the Human Services business unit.

Prior to joining Netsmart, he spent 13 years with Pfizer where he focused on building relationships and clinical initiatives with Integrated Delivery Networks.

Scott holds a bachelor’s degree in industrial psychology from Kansas State University and a graduate certificate in healthcare leadership from Park University.

©2025 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared on the Netsmart blog and is reprinted here with permission. For more information or to request permission to print, please contact Netsmart.

Industry Update

by Kristin Rowan | Apr 24, 2025 | Admin, Advocacy, Medicaid, Medicare, Medicare Advantage, Regulatory

by Kristin Rowan, Editor

Industry Update with Dr. Steve Landers

At last week’s New England Home Care & Hospice Conference, Dr. Steve Landers, President of The National Alliance for Care at Home (The Alliance) gave the keynote address and offered some industry insights and updates.

A Heartfelt Introduction

Ken Albert, Chairman of the Board at The Alliance introduced Dr. Landers before his address. After reading Dr. Landers’s official biography, Albert offered his own thoughts on the first few months of Landers’ tenure.

Last year, five colleagues from organizations across the country sat in D.C. interviewing candidates. While interviewing Landers, I was remarkably engaged by someone who is deeply passionate about care at home. Steve describes hospice care as a national treasure, and I don’t disagree. More than just his passion for care at home, Dr. Landers is savvy in navigating the political paradigms driving policy. He artfully combines data and stories to navigate relationships with policy makers. What I see every day is someone who roles up his sleeves for the patients we take care of with tremendous respect for the caregivers who are in the patients’ homes.

Ken Albert

Chairman of the Board, The National Alliance for Care at Home

Industry Changes, Advancements, and Ongoing Advocacy Efforts

Dr. Landers attributes much of the positive changes in D.C. to the efforts of volunteer leaders looking to move the industry forward. Care at home needs to become more streamlined, more efficient, and with a better voice.

His vision for the care at home industry is an America where everyone can access high-quality care wherever they call home.

Strong Admonition for CMS

Dr. Landers noted positive movement in some areas. However, he became passionately adamant that a payment update is not an increase if it doesn’t keep up with inflation or pay increases. “The Alliance represents providers delivering high-quality, person-centered care to million of individuals in the home, and they deserve to be recognized and compensated for the work they do,” he said.

Our Aging Nation

It should come as no surprise that older adults have a strong preference for aging at home. They prioritize living where they feel in control and connected. They want to be in familiar surroundings and to maintain their routines.

The U.S. population over the age of 85 is expected to triple from 2020-2060 to more than 19 million people. Despite medical advances, only 1/3 of those over the age of 85 say they are free of disability or free of difficulty with daily living.

With the rising number of older individuals, caregiver to patient ratios are falling nearly everywhere across the country. Dr. Landers and The Alliance urge policymakers to make promoting the dignity and independence of our aging population one of their highest health policy priorities. The Alliance will continue to tell anyone and everyone who will listen that care at home offers the win-win solution that policymakers are looking for.

Changes at the Top

We’ve already seen numerous and sometimes drastic changes at the federal level. Dr. Landers points out that eight years ago the “Trump 1.0 Administration” developed the PDGM framework and signed hospice reform legislation. On the campaign trail, President Trump stated he would not be making cuts to Medicare. The “Trump 2.0” care at home priorities are not yet clear, but The Alliance will continue to emphasize cost savings and the preference to age in place.

Secretary Kennedy, head of HHS, placed his emphasis on the chronic disease epidemic, launching Making America Healthy Again. He has stated a preference for community-based solutions and patient-centered care.

New CMS Administrator Dr. Oz seems to be supportive of Medicare Advantage, but did have some critique of the program during senate hearings. Dr. Oz has a stated focus of finding and eliminating fraud, waste, and abuse.

Changes Near the Top

At the congressional level, The Alliance lost a few key supporters with the last election, but many care at home advocates remained. Of the returning members of the Senate and House, care at home advocates include:

Senators Collins (R-ME), Hassan (D-NH), Tillis (R-NC), Barrasso (R-WY), Blackburn (R-TN), CortezMasto (D-NV), and Rosen (D-NV)
Representatives: Adrian Smith (R-NE), Sewell (D-AL) Van Duyne (R-TX), Panetta (D-CA), Guthrie (RKY), and Carter (R-GA)

The support in Congress leaves us hopeful. Large Reconciliation Packages dominate the current conversation. Many questions remain as to what is at risk for care at home and what Medicaid’s future might hold.

Later this year, The Alliance sees opportunities for care at home outside of reconciliation. These include Home Health PDGM reform, hospice reform, the telehealth extension, revocation of the Medicaid HCBS 80/20 rule, tax credits, and long term care insurance.

Public Policy Priorities

As The Alliance moves forward, several key issues will remain priorities:

Access to Care at Home

PDGM Implementation
Telehealth Extension
Medicare Advantage Dynamics
Care for High Needs Beneficiaries

Quality Care at Home

Special Focus Program Implementation
DEA Telehealth Provisions
HOPE tool implementation?

Eliminating Fraud and Abuse in Care at Home

Hospice Concurrent Care
Hospice and Medicare Advantage
Medicaid 80/20 Rule
Caregiver Tax Credits / LTCI

Growing the Care at Home Workforce

Supply is simply not meeting demand
Strengthened rates, incentives, and educational opportunities will attract and retain a qualified workforce

Follow Up

I spoke with Dr. Landers after the keynote address to ask him why lone worker safety was not among the top priorities of The Alliance. He assured me that there is a position within The Alliance who, among other tasks, is focusing on lone worker safety. I urged him to make it a higher priority and will follow up to get the contact information for the position he mentioned.

# # #

That’s a No-No

by Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq. | Apr 24, 2025 | Admin, Hospice, Medicaid, Medicare, Medicare Advantage, Regulatory

by Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.

No-no # 1

“No-No” may seem like something you would say to a toddler, but there is a list of things agency owners do that they should not do. Many of these are things providers may not often consider. This article focuses on the use of private duty services by hospice and home health patients, and what hospices and home health agencies cannot do with regard to aide services.

Aide Services

Both home health and hospice services are usually intermittent and provided in patients’ homes. Patients and their families may elect to utilize the services of private duty/home care companies for additional assistance. At the same time, hospice and home health patients may receive aide services from hospices and home health agencies.

Conditions of Participation

According to Medicare Conditions of Participation (CoPs), hospice and home health aides can only provide personal care services, including bathing. Aides provided by private duty/home care companies may also provide personal care. Unlike aides provided by hospices and home health agencies, however, they can provide additional services; such as laundry, food preparation, light housekeeping, shopping, and running errands.

Private Duty Services

When patients use private duty services, they are often paying for these services out of their own pockets. Even if they have long-term care insurance, patients still bear the financial burden of paying for private duty services. Longterm care insurance often costs thousands of dollars that patients probably paid for themselves. Patients usually pay by the hour for these services.

That's a No-No

Patients may, of course, utilize private duty/home care services to perform any of the services described above. It seems, however, that hospices routinely tell patients who have private duty/home care that they will not provide aide services because private duty/home care aides are able to provide personal care for patients.

Breaking it Down

Here is an example: A hospice admitted a bedridden patient with urinary and fecal incontinence. The patient and caregiver requested aide services from the hospice five days a week to bathe him. He paid for a few hours of private duty/home care services each day. The hospice refused to provide aide services five days a week to bathe him because he had private duty/home care services. No-no!

Compelled to Provide Care

ospices must provide aide services consistent with patients’ needs related to their terminal illnesses. In the example above, the patient clearly had a need for aide services five days a week. If patients and their caregivers state that they prefer to use private caregivers for personal care, then hospices must document the refusal of hospice aide services offered, consistent with applicable standards of care. Then hospices are not required to provide aide services.

Profiteering

When hospices deny aide services that are consistent with applicable standards of care and require patients and caregivers to use private duty/home care services, hospices are shifting the cost of aide services onto patients and their families. Patients and their families may have to pay for additional private duty/home care services to meet patients’ needs. The result for hospices is that they do not incur the costs of aide services, thereby increasing their profits at the expense of patients and their families.

If hospice staff members who refuse to provide aide services to patients and require patients and their families to use private duty/home care services instead are compensated in any way based on the financial performance or profitability of the hospices, let’s hope they look good in orange jumpsuits!

Intent to Defraud

If the private duty/home care services are being paid for by any federal or state health care program; such as Medicaid, Medicaid waiver, VA, or TriCare; then both home health agencies and hospices have engaged in fraudulent conduct by shifting costs that they should have incurred onto other federal government programs.

God forbid that the hospice also owns the company from which patients receive private duty/home care services! Then hospices are limiting their costs while profiting from patients and their families.

Dig Deep and Find Your No-No's

Now is the time for all home health agencies and hospices especially to audit patients’ records to make certain that all patients have been offered services that they are required to provide. If patients and their families choose to use private duty/home care aides instead, documentation must show that they were offered the services but chose to use private duty/home care aides.

No-No's Final Thoughts

The bottom line is that hospices and home health agencies must always provide services needed by patients. Patients may choose to pay for services that are paid for by the Medicare hospice or home health benefits. Patients cannot be required to pay for services privately that hospices and home health agencies must provide. Unacceptable!

This article is the first in a series of “No-no” items for agency owners.

# # #

No portion of this material may be reproduced in any form without the advance written permission of the author.

Ensuring HIPAA Compliance in Healthcare Communication

by Rowan Report | Mar 31, 2025 | Admin, Clinical, HIPAA

by Devin Paullin, CGO at Skyscape Buzz

Ensuring HIPAA Compliance

Communications Requiring HIPAA Compliance

While patient communication requires HIPAA adherence, so does any discussion between other parties. Essentially, any time PHI is discussed, a degree of confidentiality must be involved. For example, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) requires that sensitive patient data be protected when shared or discussed among:

Healthcare Providers and Patients
- Any time a caregiver, staff member, doctor, nurse, or any other employee communicates with a patient, resident, or client, outside of face-to-face meetings, it must be done securely in a way that meets HIPAA standards.
Healthcare Professionals Among Themselves
- HIPAA compliance must be met when healthcare professionals discuss PHI within their department or collaborate with external departments.
Healthcare Providers and Insurance Companies
- Insurance providers require patient details and sensitive PHI. Still, anything that makes information vulnerable to interception must be fully compliant with HIPAA standards.
Healthcare Organizations and Third-Party Associates
- Third parties that need to handle PHI (e.g., IT consultants, collections agencies, or other vendors) must do so in a way that protects patient data. To safeguard communication, healthcare organizations should ask outside associates, vendors, or agencies to sign a business associate agreement (BAA) and/or Data Processing Agreement (DPA). This is a formal agreement to comply with HIPAA standards and ensure accountability.
Healthcare Organizations and Public Health Authorities
- Some diseases or conditions require healthcare professionals to report to public health authorities (e.g. COVID-19 information during the pandemic). This communication requires stringent security measures and protection of PHI.

Why HIPAA Compliance Matters

In healthcare, effective communication is essential for providing high-quality care. However, without HIPAA compliance, the risk of data breaches increases. Implementing secure, HIPAA-compliant communication systems ensures the protection of Personal Health Information (PHI) while improving overall operational efficiency.

Key Benefits of HIPAA-Compliant Communication

Protects Patient Privacy and Data Security
- HIPAA-compliant platforms use advanced encryption and access controls to prevent unauthorized access. This protects patient information, including medical histories, diagnoses, and test results.
Enhances Communication Efficiency
- Secure messaging platforms streamline communication between patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers. These tools eliminate inefficient methods like phone calls and ensure real-time communication.
Strengthens Collaborative Care
- Providing high-quality healthcare often involves a team of professionals working together. Whether it is a hospital placing a patient in rehabilitation or home care, coordinating with intake team, care team and providers,collaboration is key. HIPAA-compliant communication tools allow these professionals to securely share critical patient information, ensuring everyone has the details they need to deliver cohesive, well-informed care.
Reduces Legal and Financial Risks
- Compliance with HIPAA regulations minimizes the risk of violations, protecting organizations from hefty fines and legal repercussions.
Maintains Patient Trust
- Patients are more likely to engage openly with healthcare providers when they feel confident that their sensitive information is protected.

How to Ensure HIPAA Compliance in Communication

To comply with HIPAA regulations, healthcare organizations should adopt the following secure communication methods:

Encrypted Emails
- Ensure emails containing PHI are encrypted and, in some cases, require patient consent.
Secure Messaging Platforms
- Use platforms specifically designed for HIPAA compliance for text-based communication.
HIPAA-Compliant Voice Calls and Telehealth
- Ensure voice and video communication channels are encrypted and secure.
Patient Portals
- Provide secure portals with two-factor authentication for patients to access their medical information.
Secure File Sharing
- Use encrypted systems for sharing patient documents and medical records.

Implementing HIPAA-Compliant Communication Platforms

Adopting a HIPAA-compliant communication platform requires a thorough evaluation of existing systems and policies. Organizations should consider the following steps:

Conduct a Communication Audit
- Identify all channels currently used for healthcare communication and assess their compliance.
Choose a Secure Platform
- Select an all-in-one communication solution designed to meet HIPAA standards.
Establish Access Controls
- Implement role-based access to ensure only authorized personnel can view PHI.
Provide Staff Training
- Educate employees on the importance of HIPAA compliance and how to use secure communication tools.
Monitor and Evaluate
- Regularly assess communication practices to identify and address vulnerabilities.

Final Thoughts

HIPAA-compliant communication is not just a legal obligation—it’s a commitment to patient privacy, security, and high-quality care. By implementing secure communication platforms, healthcare organizations can enhance efficiency, foster trust, and reduce the risk of data breaches. Investing in compliance is an investment in the long-term success and reputation of your organization.

# # #

Devin Paullin HIPAA Compliance in Home Healthcare

Devin Paullin is an award-winning innovator and executive in Healthcare Technology, having developed successful products, solutions, and partnerships in Life Sciences, Post-Acute Care, SDOH, and Long-Term industries.

He is currently Chief Growth Officer for Skyscape which provides Buzz, an all-in-one, real-time HIPAA-compliant clinical collaboration and communication platform that enables the entire staff (admins, operations, clinicians, caregivers, partners, patients, and families) with the tools to communicate securely, easily, in groups or one to one, and affordable, by any mode they choose. Visit Buzz or contact them to learn more about Buzz by Skyscape today.

©2024 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in Healthcare at Home: The Rowan Report. One copy may be printed for personal use: further reproduction by permission only. editor@therowanreport.com

« Older Entries

Next Entries »